-show-super '
> 'df -h'
>
> Then umount the volume, and mount with option enospc_debug, and try to
> reproduce the problem, then include everything from dmesg from the
> time the volume was mounted.
>
> --
> Chris Murphy
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:09 AM, cheater00 .
I have been unable to reproduce so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
I have a 6TB partition here, it filled up while still just under 2TB
were on it. btrfs fi df showed that Data is 1.92TB:
Data, single: total=1.92TiB, used=1.92TiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=224.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
Metadata, DUP: total=5.00GiB, used=3.32GiB
Met
I am getting a sata dock for my laptop next week. Until then, is it
possible to perform an action in btrfs (like rm which seems to trigger
the issue) and make it log what exactly it's doing?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-10-29 11:49, cheater00
the meantime. I have never used it. I'm
getting the "minimal installation cd" from 29th september.
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/20150929/install-x86-minimal-20150929.iso
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-10-29 09:03
n the disk holding the system. I consider this a pretty
bad bug... should we go on with trying to reproduce a minimum case?
How would I go about this?
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-10-27 10:43, cheater00 . wrote:
>>
>> I have remount
Can I have nodatacow but still have checksumming?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> I'll just add nodatacow to the fstab, because the whole disk is for downloads.
> There actually is compression happening?
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Holger Hoffstätt
I'll just add nodatacow to the fstab, because the whole disk is for downloads.
There actually is compression happening?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Holger Hoffstätte
wrote:
> On 10/27/15 15:43, cheater00 . wrote:
>> I have remounted without autodefrag and the issue keep
I have remounted without autodefrag and the issue keeps on happening.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> Feel free to suggest a good 1.5m USB3 cable, too. Let's get rid of all
> the unknowns.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:26 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
>> If
Feel free to suggest a good 1.5m USB3 cable, too. Let's get rid of all
the unknowns.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:26 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> If you can suggest a dual (or better yet quad) USB3 bay that can be
> bought on Amazon, I'll buy it now, and once that arrives, we can be
>
If you can suggest a dual (or better yet quad) USB3 bay that can be
bought on Amazon, I'll buy it now, and once that arrives, we can be
sure it's not the JMicron chipset.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:22 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> The (dual) HDD bay and the chipset are, according to lsu
n that it does, then that is a serious bug that needs to be
> fixed). That said, unless you have some desperate need to be running 32-bit
> only, you should seriously look into updating to a 64-bit version, your
> whole system should run faster, and Ubuntu has really good 32-bit
> compatibili
No, sadly the intervals don't seem to be regular like that.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> cheater00 . posted on Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:00:05 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> currently my computer freezes every several seconds for half a se
a new spike happens, a freeze happens just before
that... that's the only time those freezes happen, too.
Please advise.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:31 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> I do not experience btrfs-transacti going up to 100% for minutes at a
> time now (not reproduced yet) but I have
yping, then what I typed during that time gets lost,
like if I never typed that.
I have also connected the same HDD bay with a USB3 cable instead of
USB2. It's on an USB3 port. So it's running via USB3 now.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:43 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> So far I cannot rep
So far I cannot reproduce. If I don't post again this means the issue
has been fixed by updating the kernel.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> I have located 4.3.0-rc7 binaries which I will now try.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
>
I have located 4.3.0-rc7 binaries which I will now try.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. What version did this go into? I'll try getting
> a prebuilt backport of the kernel, building source could slow things
> down considerably, but de
the latest deb newer than that, or I'll build if that's not
available.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> On 10/26/2015 08:16 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>> I am running into really bad performance. Here's my setup:
>>
>> WD
issue must lie elsewhere.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:46 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
> I don't remember doing that, but just to exclude everything, how do I check?
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Donald Pearson
> wrote:
>> AFAIK quotas aren't a mount option, but if you ne
t be
> something else.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:36 AM, cheater00 . wrote:
>> There are no quotas. I haven't enabled them. I believe the fstab says
>> that - could they be enabled in another way? How do I check for sure?
>> The man page doesn't say how to ch
ld Pearson
wrote:
> Accidentally didn't reply to the list the 1st time.
>
> I see the same issue when I have quotas enabled. If you have quotas
> on, see if turning them off helps.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:16 AM, cheater00 . wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I am r
Hi guys,
I am running into really bad performance. Here's my setup:
WD Red 6 TB connected over USB2 to my core i7 laptop, running Ubuntu
32-bit with kernel 4.0.4-040004-generic #201505171336.
Single btrfs partition covering whole disk.
Autodefrag is on.
fstab line:
UUID=... /media/X btrfs rw,no
22 matches
Mail list logo
