On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:53:20AM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Filipe David Borba Manana
>> wrote:
>> > Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
>> > wait for delayed work to finis
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:53:20AM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Filipe David Borba Manana
> wrote:
> > Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
> > wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
> > caller. This chan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Filipe David Borba Manana
wrote:
> Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
> wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
> caller. This change fixes this, ensuring that there's no data loss
> if a power failure happens
Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
caller. This change fixes this, ensuring that there's no data loss
if a power failure happens right after fs sync returns success to
the caller and before the next commit
