Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: utils: negative numbers are more plausible than sizes over 8 EiB

2017-01-03 Thread David Sterba
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:39:54PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > I got tired of seeing "16.00EiB" whenever btrfs-progs encounters a > negative size value, e.g. during resize: > > Unallocated: >/dev/mapper/datamd18 16.00EiB > > This version is much more useful: > > Unallocated: >/dev/map

Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: utils: negative numbers are more plausible than sizes over 8 EiB

2016-12-05 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:39:54PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > I got tired of seeing "16.00EiB" whenever btrfs-progs encounters a > negative size value, e.g. during resize: > > Unallocated: >/dev/mapper/datamd18 16.00EiB > > This version is much more useful: > > Unallocated: >/dev/map

[PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: utils: negative numbers are more plausible than sizes over 8 EiB

2016-12-03 Thread Zygo Blaxell
I got tired of seeing "16.00EiB" whenever btrfs-progs encounters a negative size value, e.g. during resize: Unallocated: /dev/mapper/datamd18 16.00EiB This version is much more useful: Unallocated: /dev/mapper/datamd18 -26.29GiB Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell --- v2: change the function