On 09/16/2011 12:25 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> David Sterba wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote:
On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi
> I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:25:51AM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
> >WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5711 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x180/0x350
> >[btrfs]()
> >
>
> FWIW, I'm seeing a slightly different case, while testing branch
> integration/btrfs-next (commit 2828cbd9620e03) from
> git://repo.or.cz/
David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote:
On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi
I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5.
Have posted a patch for this:
http://m
Hi Josef,
the commit is not in there, but the code looks like your post.
if (--trans->use_count) {
trans->block_rsv = trans->orig_rsv;
return 0;
}
trans->block_rsv = NULL;
while (count < 4) {
unsigned long cur = trans->delay
On 09/16/2011 10:09 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi Josef,
> after a quick test it seems that I do not hit this Warning any longer.
> But I got a new one.
>
Hmm looks like that may not be my newest stuff, is commit
57f499e1bb76ba3ebeb09cd12e9dac84baa5812b
in there? Specifically look at __btrfs_
Hi Josef,
after a quick test it seems that I do not hit this Warning any longer.
But I got a new one.
[ 5241.839951] [ cut here ]
[ 5241.839974] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5715
btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xac/0x330 [btrfs]()
[ 5241.839979] Hardware name: MS-96B3
[ 52
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:50:29PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > We're still seeing this with -rc6, which includes 98c9942 and 65450aa.
> > >
> > > I haven't looked at the reservation code in much detail. Is there
> > > anything I can do to help track
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:50:29PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > We're still seeing this with -rc6, which includes 98c9942 and 65450aa.
> >
> > I haven't looked at the reservation code in much detail. Is there
> > anything I can do to help track this down?
> >
>
> This should be taken care of
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
> > > kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5.
> > >
> >
> > Have posted a patch for th
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
> > > kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5.
> > >
> >
> > Have posted a patch for th
t; Best Regards,
> > martin
> >
> > [ 5472.099766] ----[ cut here ]----
> > [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193
> > btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]()
> > [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3
> > [ 5472.099842] Modu
martin
>
> [ 5472.099766] [ cut here ]--------
> [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193
> btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]()
> [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3
> [ 5472.099842] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm
> i2c_
Hi
I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5.
Best Regards,
martin
[ 5472.099766] [ cut here ]
[ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193
btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]()
[ 5472.099838] Hardware name
13 matches
Mail list logo
