I have the same trouble. Beside the sync trouble I had a vry slow
channel switching and OSD in wrong colors.
The next thing I was thinking of is maybe a misalignment of my dish after
some storms here. But analog Sat TV is just fine.
Will add big coolors for both cards
Tobias
--
Info:
To
On Friday 17 August 2001 12:07 am, you wrote:
> Like the line number of the channels.conf file, the PNR is just one number.
> Unlike the line number, the PNR uniquely identifies the channel.
Sadly, the PNR isn't unique in general. It is possibly true at 19E, but not
at other positions
For exam
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > to use the PNR instead of the line number of the channels.conf
> > file.
> Frankly, I like it the way it is right now.
>
> If you put all the information from the channel list into the timer,
> then what if you modify a channel?
Like the line number of the
Juergen Sauer wrote:
>
> Hi!
> yesterday I've expierenced a problem and found the real solution.
> So I would give you an pointer and message what and why.
>
> Yesterday my Haupauge DVBs card felt into an infinite "channel not
> synced" troubel. The problem was not in the software, I recocnized
Gerhard Achs wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It´s me again, and its up again to a proposal ...
> Perhaps you remember my musicvideo problem ... It would be nice if there
> was a possibility to play back one whole subdirectory (of course I would
> prefer a real playlist, but I think I should not be that sa
Carsten Koch wrote:
>
> Rainer Zocholl wrote:
> >
> > Just found VDR recording a completely wrong program...#5 instead of #1
> >
> > After a while i found that this is caused by the timer format:
> > The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
> >
> > Meanwhile i had resorted the c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
yesterday I've expierenced a problem and found the real solution.
So I would give you an pointer and message what and why.
Yesterday my Haupauge DVBs card felt into an infinite "channel not
synced" troubel. The problem was not in the software, I
Rainer Zocholl wrote:
>
> Just found VDR recording a completely wrong program...#5 instead of #1
>
> After a while i found that this is caused by the timer format:
> The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
>
> Meanwhile i had resorted the channel list...so 5 becomes
> an othe
Am 16.08.2001, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer Zocholl)
...
> The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
> Meanwhile i had resorted the channel list...so 5 becomes
> an other program.
> The timers were not back annotated. (OK: how should it be done?)
AFAIR if you use VDRs cha
Hello,
It´s me again, and its up again to a proposal ...
Perhaps you remember my musicvideo problem ... It would be nice if there
was a possibility to play back one whole subdirectory (of course I would
prefer a real playlist, but I think I should not be that sassy ...)as
they will be implemen
> But if I want to recognize them in the OSD I have to rename them, right?
Yes, and if you don't use the EPG to set the timer, the content information
will also be lost (I don't know if Pro7 broadcasts any content information
with its program schedule, though).
Regards,
hh
--
Info:
To unsubs
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:42:19AM +0100, Ingvar Nedrebo wrote:
> I'm in the planning stages of putting together a Linux box to
> use for VDR, amongst other things (database, web). Having
> spent my previous life working with Sun/Solaris, I'm a bit
> unfamiliar with PC hardware and components, and
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
> The idea is good ! But I am afraid that switching the recording from one
> card to another breaks the stream somehow - so the result would be file with
> some kind of frame error in it !?
>
> If this card change really can be made
Hello,
I´m running two cards on a Pentium 200MMX with 96MB and a 40GB HDD
connected to the (slow) on-board IDE controller, without any problems.
This machine is also working as mail-, file-, proxy-, web-, ... server,
so I think there´s no need for speed ;-)
Gerhard
Ingvar Nedrebo wrote
Hello,
first of all it´s a really great job you do with this project.
I´m using VDR 0.7x for several month whithout problems.
Yesterday I´m switcht to VDR 0.91 and dvb 0.9-20010803 downloaded from
http://www.cadsoft.de/people/kls/vdr/download.htm after an fresh
installation of suse 7.2
After som
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:42:19AM +0100, Ingvar Nedrebo wrote:
> needs to be? Advice on motherboard, do I need a 1GHz Athlon
> or will a 700MHz Duron do,
700 MHz Duron will do. CPU power is not the problem.
> PC100 vs PC133,
PC100 is sufficient, but I don't think it's worth buying anym
Hauppauge are distributing a press release dated 13th August stating
availablilty of the USB and PCI product by the end of August.
Various UK online suppliers are already taking orders, www.dabs.com are
suggesting shipping will begin in early September... but Hauppauge have been
promising this pr
I'm in the planning stages of putting together a Linux box to
use for VDR, amongst other things (database, web). Having
spent my previous life working with Sun/Solaris, I'm a bit
unfamiliar with PC hardware and components, and wondered if
anybody could give some advice on how powerful my hardware
Please post to the list as soon as you hear anything about
a UK DVB-T card -- I'm very interested in getting one.
Will the CAM for ITV Digital be a problem?
Regards,
Ingvar
On Thursday, August 16, 2001, at 12:11 , Dave Chapman wrote:
> I'm glad to read that Convergence are working on DVB-T driv
19 matches
Mail list logo
