On Tuesday 02 March 2004 14:25, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > The frontend on mine can get a lock at 27500, but I'd noticed when I read
> > the values back from the hardware that it had actually detected 27504..
>
> Sounds like the broadcaster has a problem.
>
> > Anothe
Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>
> The frontend on mine can get a lock at 27500, but I'd noticed when I read the
> values back from the hardware that it had actually detected 27504..
Sounds like the broadcaster has a problem.
> Another thing is that 11747000 is _really_ close to the lnb switch freque
On Monday 01 March 2004 21:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:02:19PM +, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > Hi, I've just encountered something very weird about frequency inversion.
> > With my new stv0299 code, I'm able to get a much better signal for lots
> > of chann
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:02:19PM +, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>
> Hi, I've just encountered something very weird about frequency inversion. With
> my new stv0299 code, I'm able to get a much better signal for lots of
> channels. Except one. 11747000 on hotbird (EDTV Dubai etc). This is
From: "Andrew de Quincey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> With the new code I'm not able to lock on 11747 at all. But.. as I
> was despairing of things to try, I tried turning inversion ON.
> Now I can lock on to that signal perfectly (but none of the others,
> 'cos they require inversion OFF).
>
> Can some
