Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: give RO message when recovering superblock

2016-03-23 Thread Marc Lehmann
code+content MORPG -==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

2007-10-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

2007-10-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
NU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT

Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

2007-10-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
if (fork () = 0) { close (5); // fd 5 is now removed from the epoll set of the parent. _exit (0); } -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns

2007-10-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
Hi! I ran into what I see as unsolvable problems that make epoll useless as a generic event mechanism. I recently switched to libevent as event loop, and found that my programs work fine when it is using select or poll, but work eratically or halt when using epoll. The reason as I found out is t

Re: masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weird obervation 2: > > Some sites could be connected to with TCP. It turned out that those > sites did not support TCP SACK. Indeed, turning off SACK either on the > remote side of a

masquerading failure for at least icmp and tcp+sack on amd64

2005-09-06 Thread Marc Lehmann
ry out to find out more about this problem? -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/ -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

Re: Kernel BUG at "fs/exec.c":777

2005-08-21 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:49:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If wanted, I can probably reproduce > > that without the nvidia kernel module loaded. > > > > Yes, please do that,

Re: Kernel BUG at "fs/exec.c":777

2005-08-21 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:49:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If wanted, I can probably reproduce > > that without the nvidia kernel module loaded. > > > > Yes, please do that, t

Kernel BUG at "fs/exec.c":777

2005-08-17 Thread Marc Lehmann
xecve+386} {system_call+126} {sys_execve+65} {stub_execve+106} Code: 0f 0b 05 ec 42 80 ff ff ff ff 09 03 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 00 RIP {flush_old_exec+1531} RSP nfs warning: mount version older than kernel -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_

Re: critical bugs in md raid5 and ATA disk failure/recovery modes

2005-01-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
;t, juts as with a normal disk. What raid provides is just more redundant data in normal operation - it doens't suffer from silent data corruption more than a normal disk. -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __

Re: critical bugs in md raid5

2005-01-26 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:11:34AM +0100, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The summary seems to be that the linux raid driver only protects your data > > as long as all disks are fine and the machine never crashes. &

critical bugs in md raid5

2005-01-26 Thread Marc Lehmann
the good work that alraedy went into linux, though! Hope this helps, -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/ -=/_/_//_/

yellowfin-driver and symbios cards

2001-06-06 Thread Marc Lehmann
ms that my symbios card is "a future perfect board". -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/

Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

2001-06-06 Thread Marc Lehmann
roblem. I *do* hate silent data corruption :() -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation |

Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

2001-06-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
n another computer (the data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs without altered bytes). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __

Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

2001-06-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
an additional promise ultra 100. board: asus cuv4x-d (Apollo MVP3 AGP + via686b southbridge) -- -==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|

Re: 2.4.2 + aic7xxx still broken

2001-03-10 Thread Marc Lehmann
ince glibc-2.1 installed it there). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/

Re: linux swap freeze STILL in 2.4.x

2001-02-26 Thread Marc Lehmann
tch (and, if not, I'll eventually have to hack it myself to gte my data. After all it's source... ...) -- -==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: linux swap freeze STILL in 2.4.x

2001-02-25 Thread Marc Lehmann
crypto-patch applied, so this is probably not a 2.4.2 issue anyway since there is no 2.4.2 crypto patch). Happy Hacking ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc

Re: linux swap freeze STILL in 2.4.x

2001-02-25 Thread Marc Lehmann
ly because of sudden OOM and/or reiserfs ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ X

Re: linux swap freeze STILL in 2.4.x

2001-02-25 Thread Marc Lehmann
Well, it didn't start, the system just froze. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /

linux swap freeze STILL in 2.4.x

2001-02-25 Thread Marc Lehmann
tches? ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The c

major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE Linux)

2001-01-09 Thread Marc Lehmann
87878 78787878 78787878 78787878 78787878 78787878 78787878 78787878 Call Trace: [] [] Code: 89 1f 8b 44 24 18 29 47 08 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d 81 c4 2c 01 00 -- -==- | ==-- _

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
file or directory So, no, linux certainly does NOT remove "." ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state)

2001-01-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
is makes sense: you are not reading the directory... -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

2001-01-06 Thread Marc Lehmann
code (e.g.) would cope with yte another compliation in the code ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EM

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

2001-01-06 Thread Marc Lehmann
ro Mount the file system read-only. Which it does even with journaling filesystems... -- -==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECT

time function problems with 2.2.18 / hang

2000-12-22 Thread Marc Lehmann
hat is the strangest thing I ever saw in a release kernel ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PRO

Re: recursive exports && linux nfs

2000-12-17 Thread Marc Lehmann
ories (VERY expensive) and require network access (making all clients NOT survive a reboot). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /

recursive exports && linux nfs

2000-12-12 Thread Marc Lehmann
s not supported" ;) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation |

reordering pci interrupts?

2000-11-18 Thread Marc Lehmann
the kernel). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU

routing problems with 2.2

2000-11-14 Thread Marc Lehmann
2.172.23.21/32 scope global tun2 -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |

Re: Dual XEON - >>SLOW<< on SMP

2000-11-13 Thread Marc Lehmann
doing so in the future? And please keep this off-list from now on. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation

Re: Dual XEON - >>SLOW<< on SMP

2000-11-11 Thread Marc Lehmann
te if you didn't put your words into my mouth. *puzzled* -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: non-gcc linux?

2000-11-05 Thread Marc Lehmann
s, also ;) > Statements above are my own, and I am not a lawyer. Yepp. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /

Re: non-gcc linux?

2000-11-05 Thread Marc Lehmann
en the FSD ever wanted to go to court to defend the freedom of gcc. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/

Re: select() bug

2000-11-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
ough it's not necessary on the read side, AFAIK). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-03 Thread Marc Lehmann
t for 3.0. Unfortunately some company couldn't wait. The higher numbers probably... -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -==

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
really* doesn't belong on linux-kernel. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE

Re: compiler explodes on pegasus driver in 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
y gcc-2.95.2 (or 2.7.2.3) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The ch

Re: Disk priorities...

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
considerably without ever working great). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
ility because of forked versions for no benefits. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIP

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
w that adds a a lot of extra, unneecessary work and confusion to the free software community. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
gainst mindless forking without stating this, though, even if allowed by the license. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
ment), slackware, stampede and many others. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
le. Why do you keep ignoring this point? -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
kewise one never needed their libstdc++ or their toolchain, the official ones (released by the official maintainers) always were enough. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
r example). Again, the choice redhat did can not be construed as being some mistake by some guy or a group of guys. It was a deliberate decision. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---=

Re: To Matti

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 11:20:42PM +0200, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just FYI; I tried to reply to your mail (you know the topic) but your Thanks for your reply. O.k. in short: I didn't agree back when you sent the message, but then the thread had more on-top

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > owning Cygnus) is purest garbage. The whole *point* of the Steering > > Committee is to prevent any single interest from gaining control of > > BTW, AFAIK gcc is the only large free soft

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
wether it's right, or what the consequences are. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX1

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
s of the development toolchain / runtime environment to use them :( -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation |

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-10-01 Thread Marc Lehmann
he snapshot it bases on) and countless fsf snapshots of 2.96. They act similarly, but not the same, complicating any discussion about it. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
he name-calling right now. I'll try as best as I can to keep the disucssion to the original, on-topic point only. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehma

Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?)

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
d parts of your mail, btw.) -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11

To Matti

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
Just FYI; I tried to reply to your mail (you know the topic) but your mailserver blocked me. I didn't ignore that mail. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
re is no need to fight over misquoted mails. Please do calm down. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
t;. Great future. Anyway, my pont *here* is that the kernel shouldn't explicitly support this marketing. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choic

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
gcc people Sorry, the only ones who actually broke anything major were redhat, this is a hard fact. -- -==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [E

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
monopolize the market at the cost of morality, ethics and free software. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
ed you could keep to *technical* reasoning, though :( -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
lp binary compatibility. > Let me metion the Nazi's. Now can the thread die ? Aren't you paid by redhat? ;-> -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
tion and obviously now plays monopoly games. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
ill change, which is widely known and should have been pointed out by your informants :( Anyway, this is really starting to be off-topic, sorry.. -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
ther big company who tries to monopolize his os by making it incompatible to anythign else... -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-29 Thread Marc Lehmann
gcc snapshots... -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

Re: BPF in the kernel

2000-09-21 Thread Marc Lehmann
suddenly works ;") -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_

Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 - release 0.0

2000-09-21 Thread Marc Lehmann
alternative to reiserfs! -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+

Re: If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?

2000-08-29 Thread Marc Lehmann
header files (and the GPL includes these, a common problem). -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/