Hi Will,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:51:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Sure, that makes sense to me: I've included a diff below in case anybody
> has comments. I've tackled it slightly differently to how the intel and
> amd drivers are handled, since we have a header file (arm-smmu.h) which
> is
Hi Joerg,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 03:33:23PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:03:53AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Please pull these Arm SMMU driver updates for 5.9. Summary is in the tag,
> > but the main thing is support for two new SoC integrations, one of which
> > is c
Hi Will,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:03:53AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Please pull these Arm SMMU driver updates for 5.9. Summary is in the tag,
> but the main thing is support for two new SoC integrations, one of which
> is considerably more brain-dead than the other (determining which one is
>
Hi Joerg,
Please pull these Arm SMMU driver updates for 5.9. Summary is in the tag,
but the main thing is support for two new SoC integrations, one of which
is considerably more brain-dead than the other (determining which one is
left as an exercise to the reader although the diffstat is fairly re
4 matches
Mail list logo
