Re: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations.

2007-07-13 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi Kirill, On 7/13/07, Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Look, until you have any numbers in hands it's impossible to say which one is faster. Well, it's not too hard to guess: struct dentry is 124 bytes on i386 so kmem_cache_zalloc over it is bound to be slower tha kmem_cache_alloc a

Re: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations.

2007-07-13 Thread Kirill Korotaev
034de2e9d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800 >>>Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to >>>remove some following zero initializations. >>> >

Re: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations.

2007-07-13 Thread rae l
e: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to > remove some following zero initializations. > > Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > fs/dcache.c | 12 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions

Re: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations.

2007-07-13 Thread Kirill Korotaev
; Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to > remove some following zero initializations. > > Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > fs/dcache.c | 12 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --

[PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations.

2007-07-12 Thread Denis Cheng
>From 4d87e14b67890f06885a76b5792ca034de2e9d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to remove some following zero initializations. Signed-off-by: Denis Chen