Hi Kirill,
On 7/13/07, Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Look, until you have any numbers in hands it's impossible to say
which one is faster.
Well, it's not too hard to guess: struct dentry is 124 bytes on i386
so kmem_cache_zalloc over it is bound to be slower tha
kmem_cache_alloc a
034de2e9d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800
>>>Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to
>>>remove some following zero initializations.
>>>
>
e: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to
> remove some following zero initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 12 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions
; Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to
> remove some following zero initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 12 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --
>From 4d87e14b67890f06885a76b5792ca034de2e9d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to
remove some following zero initializations.
Signed-off-by: Denis Chen
5 matches
Mail list logo