On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/3/14 Paul Gortmaker :
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker
>>> wrote:
>>>
wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
neithe
2013/3/14 Paul Gortmaker :
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
>>> neither printk() nor printk_sched() are in use and there
>>> are actually no
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker
> wrote:
>
>> wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
>> neither printk() nor printk_sched() are in use and there
>> are actually no waiter on log_wait waitqueue. It sho
2013/3/14 Andrew Morton :
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker
> wrote:
>
>> wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
>> neither printk() nor printk_sched() are in use and there
>> are actually no waiter on log_wait waitqueue. It should
>> be a stub in this case
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker
wrote:
> wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
> neither printk() nor printk_sched() are in use and there
> are actually no waiter on log_wait waitqueue. It should
> be a stub in this case for users like bust_spinlocks().
>
wake_up_klogd() is useless when CONFIG_PRINTK=n because
neither printk() nor printk_sched() are in use and there
are actually no waiter on log_wait waitqueue. It should
be a stub in this case for users like bust_spinlocks().
Otherwise this results in this warning when CONFIG_PRINTK=n
and CONFIG_IR
6 matches
Mail list logo