Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix storing address of local variable
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 01:34:59PM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
> > index e7d1254e18ca..d1aab1cc5a37 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
> > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ TEST(test_robust_list_multiple_elements)
> > static int child_circular_list(void *arg)
> > {
> > static struct robust_list_head head;
> > - struct lock_struct a, b, c;
> > + static struct lock_struct a, b, c;
>
> I believe that the right fix here would be to drop the static from `head`
> declaration, WDYT?
Hi André,
I have tested your suggested changes.
It works fine. will send v2 patch for this.
Thanks,
-- Ankit
Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix storing address of local variable
Em 18/11/2025 13:26, Ankit Khushwaha escreveu:
In `child_circular_list()` address of local variable ‘struct lock_struct a’
is assigned to `head.list.next` raising the following warning.
robust_list.c: In function ‘child_circular_list’:
robust_list.c:522:24: warning: storing the address of local variable ‘a’
in ‘head.list.next’ [-Wdangling-pointer=]
522 | head.list.next = &a.list;
| ~~~^
robust_list.c:513:28: note: ‘a’ declared here
513 | struct lock_struct a, b, c;
|^
robust_list.c:512:40: note: ‘head’ declared here
512 | static struct robust_list_head head;
|^~~~
Defining the value with static keyword to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Khushwaha
---
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
index e7d1254e18ca..d1aab1cc5a37 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ TEST(test_robust_list_multiple_elements)
static int child_circular_list(void *arg)
{
static struct robust_list_head head;
- struct lock_struct a, b, c;
+ static struct lock_struct a, b, c;
I believe that the right fix here would be to drop the static from
`head` declaration, WDYT?
[PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix storing address of local variable
In `child_circular_list()` address of local variable ???struct lock_struct a???
is assigned to `head.list.next` raising the following warning.
robust_list.c: In function ???child_circular_list???:
robust_list.c:522:24: warning: storing the address of local variable ???a???
in ???head.list.next??? [-Wdangling-pointer=]
522 | head.list.next = &a.list;
| ~~~^
robust_list.c:513:28: note: ???a??? declared here
513 | struct lock_struct a, b, c;
|^
robust_list.c:512:40: note: ???head??? declared here
512 | static struct robust_list_head head;
|^~~~
Defining the value with static keyword to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Khushwaha
---
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
index e7d1254e18ca..d1aab1cc5a37 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ TEST(test_robust_list_multiple_elements)
static int child_circular_list(void *arg)
{
static struct robust_list_head head;
- struct lock_struct a, b, c;
+ static struct lock_struct a, b, c;
int ret;
ret = set_list(&head);
--
2.51.1

