Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

2024-11-06 Thread Christian Brauner
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 02:37:31PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> From: Tycho Andersen 
> 
> Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
> switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
> contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
> instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
> top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
> CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.
> 
> Change exec path to fix up /proc/pid/comm in the case where we have
> allocated one of these synthetic paths in bprm_init(). This way the actual
> exec machinery is unchanged, but cosmetically the comm looks reasonable to
> admins investigating things.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen 
> Suggested-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
> CC: Aleksa Sarai 
> Link: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#set-comm-field-before-exec
> ---

We finally went full circle back to what was originally proposed :)

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner 



Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

2024-11-02 Thread Kees Cook
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 11:29:55AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:37:31 -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
> > > switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
> > > contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
> > > instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
> > > top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
> > > CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to for-next/execve, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case
> >   https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/7bdc6fc85c9a
> > [2/2] selftests/exec: add a test for execveat()'s comm
> >   https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/bd104872311a
> 
> I tested this with systemd compiled with -Dfexece=true and it all
> seems to work fine. Thanks!

Great; thank you!

-- 
Kees Cook



Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

2024-11-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:37:31 -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
> > switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
> > contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
> > instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
> > top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
> > CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to for-next/execve, thanks!
> 
> [1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case
>   https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/7bdc6fc85c9a
> [2/2] selftests/exec: add a test for execveat()'s comm
>   https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/bd104872311a

I tested this with systemd compiled with -Dfexece=true and it all
seems to work fine. Thanks!

Zbyszek



Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

2024-10-31 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:37:31 -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
> switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
> contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
> instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
> top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
> CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next/execve, thanks!

[1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case
  https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/7bdc6fc85c9a
[2/2] selftests/exec: add a test for execveat()'s comm
  https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/bd104872311a

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook




[PATCH 1/2] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

2024-10-30 Thread Tycho Andersen
From: Tycho Andersen 

Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.

Change exec path to fix up /proc/pid/comm in the case where we have
allocated one of these synthetic paths in bprm_init(). This way the actual
exec machinery is unchanged, but cosmetically the comm looks reasonable to
admins investigating things.

Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen 
Suggested-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
CC: Aleksa Sarai 
Link: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#set-comm-field-before-exec
---
v2: * drop the flag, everyone :)
* change the rendered value to f_path.dentry->d_name.name instead of
  argv[0], Eric
v3: * fix up subject line, Eric
v4: * switch to no flag, always rewrite approach, with some cleanup
  suggested by Kees
---
 fs/exec.c   | 36 +++-
 include/linux/binfmts.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 6c53920795c2..3b559f598c74 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1347,7 +1347,16 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
set_dumpable(current->mm, SUID_DUMP_USER);
 
perf_event_exec();
-   __set_task_comm(me, kbasename(bprm->filename), true);
+
+   /*
+* If argv0 was set, alloc_bprm() made up a path that will
+* probably not be useful to admins running ps or similar.
+* Let's fix it up to be something reasonable.
+*/
+   if (bprm->argv0)
+   __set_task_comm(me, kbasename(bprm->argv0), true);
+   else
+   __set_task_comm(me, kbasename(bprm->filename), true);
 
/* An exec changes our domain. We are no longer part of the thread
   group */
@@ -1497,9 +1506,28 @@ static void free_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
if (bprm->interp != bprm->filename)
kfree(bprm->interp);
kfree(bprm->fdpath);
+   kfree(bprm->argv0);
kfree(bprm);
 }
 
+static int bprm_add_fixup_comm(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
+  struct user_arg_ptr argv)
+{
+   const char __user *p = get_user_arg_ptr(argv, 0);
+
+   /*
+* If p == NULL, let's just fall back to fdpath.
+*/
+   if (!p)
+   return 0;
+
+   bprm->argv0 = strndup_user(p, MAX_ARG_STRLEN);
+   if (bprm->argv0)
+   return 0;
+
+   return -EFAULT;
+}
+
 static struct linux_binprm *alloc_bprm(int fd, struct filename *filename, int 
flags)
 {
struct linux_binprm *bprm;
@@ -1906,6 +1934,12 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, struct filename 
*filename,
goto out_ret;
}
 
+   if (unlikely(bprm->fdpath)) {
+   retval = bprm_add_fixup_comm(bprm, argv);
+   if (retval != 0)
+   goto out_free;
+   }
+
retval = count(argv, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
if (retval == 0)
pr_warn_once("process '%s' launched '%s' with NULL argv: empty 
string added\n",
diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h
index e6c00e860951..bab5121a746b 100644
--- a/include/linux/binfmts.h
+++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct linux_binprm {
   of the time same as filename, but could be
   different for binfmt_{misc,script} */
const char *fdpath; /* generated filename for execveat */
+   const char *argv0;  /* argv0 from execveat */
unsigned interp_flags;
int execfd; /* File descriptor of the executable */
unsigned long loader, exec;

base-commit: c1e939a21eb111a6d6067b38e8e04b8809b64c4e
-- 
2.34.1