Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
Hi, Miroslav. > On Oct 2, 2024, at 19:44, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > Hello, > > could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? > > Miroslav Should I include selftests in one patch? Regards. Wardenjohn.
Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
On Thu 2024-10-03 16:06:59, zhang warden wrote: > Hi,Miroslav. > > > could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? > > Should I submit the selftests in one patch? I would put it into a separate patch from the patch adding the "stack_order" attribute. You might split the selftests into more patches if many selftests are added. Best Regards, Petr
Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
Hello, On Sun, 29 Sep 2024, Wardenjohn wrote: > As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs interface is > the > only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that klp_patch > is > applied to the system. > > However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a optimization > methods of the patch introducing 'using' feature to klp_func. > > But now, we don't support 'using' feature to klp_func and make 'klp_ops' patch > not necessary. > > Therefore, this new version is only introduce the sysfs feature of klp_patch > 'stack_order'. could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? Miroslav
[PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs interface is the only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that klp_patch is applied to the system. However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a optimization methods of the patch introducing 'using' feature to klp_func. But now, we don't support 'using' feature to klp_func and make 'klp_ops' patch not necessary. Therefore, this new version is only introduce the sysfs feature of klp_patch 'stack_order'. V1 -> V2: 1. According to the suggestion from Petr, to make the meaning more clear, rename 'order' to 'stack_order'. 2. According to the suggestion from Petr and Miroslav, this patch now move the calculating process to stack_order_show function. Adding klp_mutex lock protection. V2 -> V3: 1. Squash 2 patches into 1. Update description of stack_order in ABI Document. (Suggested by Miroslav) 2. Update subject and commit log. (Suggested by Miroslav) 3. Update code format for some line of the patch. (Suggested by Miroslav) Regards. Wardenjohn.

