Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
Hi, Miroslav. > On Oct 2, 2024, at 19:44, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > Hello, > > could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? > > Miroslav Should I include selftests in one patch? Regards. Wardenjohn.
Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
On Thu 2024-10-03 16:06:59, zhang warden wrote: > Hi,Miroslav. > > > could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? > > Should I submit the selftests in one patch? I would put it into a separate patch from the patch adding the "stack_order" attribute. You might split the selftests into more patches if many selftests are added. Best Regards, Petr
Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
Hello, On Sun, 29 Sep 2024, Wardenjohn wrote: > As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs interface is > the > only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that klp_patch > is > applied to the system. > > However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a optimization > methods of the patch introducing 'using' feature to klp_func. > > But now, we don't support 'using' feature to klp_func and make 'klp_ops' patch > not necessary. > > Therefore, this new version is only introduce the sysfs feature of klp_patch > 'stack_order'. could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please? Miroslav