On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> One thing we can do is letting drivers register a wake-up function
> within the SDIO core, just before suspending. Then, upon resume, if
> such a wake-up function was registered, SDIO core would invoke it just
> before it tries to read the C
Hello Zhangfei,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:10 AM, zhangfei gao wrote:
> Could we remove mmc_card_is_removable(host) condition, the skip is not
> related with whether card is removable or not, do you think so?
But, as Nicolas pointed out before, what if the card is removed (or
replaced) while the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Ohad,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 2:01 PM
>> To: zhangfei gao
>> Cc: Nicolas Pitre; Bing Zhao; Sahitya Tummala; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
>> Michal Miro
Hi Ohad,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 2:01 PM
> To: zhangfei gao
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre; Bing Zhao; Sahitya Tummala; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
> Michal Miroslaw; Chris Ball;
> Andrew Morton; Maxim Levitsky
> Subject:
2011/1/20 Chris Ball :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:45:57AM +, Tardy, Pierre wrote:
>> Chris,
>> (Sorry for top posting)
>> Seems we have a intel intern disagreement.
>>
>> Could we have maintainer opinion on this ?
>
> Linus W and Ohad, any input here? Thanks,
What I see is orthogonal purpos
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > I've already replied to you ACKing this patch, and pushed it to mmc-next.
> > >
> > Odd, I don't see that in my mailbox :-( But then I've had a few incidents
> > of being bling i
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > I've already replied to you ACKing this patch, and pushed it to mmc-next.
> >
> Odd, I don't see that in my mailbox :-( But then I've had a few incidents
> of being bling in that regard lately, so it's probably my fault. Sorry
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Jesper,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:59:25PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > We include linux/usb.h twice in drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c - once is enough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
> > ---
> > ushc.c |1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
Jesper,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:59:25PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> We include linux/usb.h twice in drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c - once is enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
> ---
> ushc.c |1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/u
We include linux/usb.h twice in drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c - once is enough.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
ushc.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c
index f8f65df..f08f944 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/ho
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:51 AM, zhangfei gao wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:56 PM, zhangfei gao wrote:
>> Update typo
>>
>> From 93873d40ea72b1ccd97c3629ffe555080ac4d0e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhangfei Gao
>> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 18:09:12 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci su
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:28 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > I had assumed that for a module the global initialized variables were
> > loaded at module load. That then is a problem given that new devices
> > (and drivers) are appearing quite rapidly. I therefore do not understand
> > how the global
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 10:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:43 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > Uninitialized global scope variables are by definition assigned to the
> > > > .bs
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:01 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:14:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > > On Fr
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 11:09 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:14:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > > > > Add a dr
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:07 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:14:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > > > Add a driver for Elan Digital System's VUB300 chip
> > > > which is a USB connec
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 10:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:43 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > Uninitialized global scope variables are by definition assigned to the
> > > .bss section. The .bss section is dynamically allocate
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:43 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Uninitialized global scope variables are by definition assigned to the
> > .bss section. The .bss section is dynamically allocated at run time
> > rather than being stored in the compiled binary
> > > > Should those be static anyhow? Being USB, you could probably hook up
> > > > two of
> > > > those and want to operate one of them in this and the other one in
> > > > another
> > > > mode?
> > >
> > > You could. Whether or not you would is another question. Until then I
> > > don't t
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:43 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:14 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > > > There are 5 "do not initialise statics" errors reported by
> > > > scripts/checkpatch.pl
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > First case: you want to stop the clock _to_ the _card_ when not talking
> > to it. That has nothing to do with power saving performed within the
> > host controller. This is for reducing powe
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Tardy, Pierre wrote:
> >
> > First case: you want to stop the clock _to_ the _card_ when not talking
> > to it. That has nothing to do with power saving performed within the
> > host controller. This is for reducing power consumption by the _card_
> > (and possibly by the
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:14 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > > There are 5 "do not initialise statics" errors reported by
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl
> >
> > you probably should fix those. They are due to lines s
> -Original Message-
> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 4:40 AM
> To: Nicolas Pitre
> Cc: Chris Ball; Dong, Chuanxiao; Tardy, Pierre; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
> Linus
> Walleij; Gao, Yunpeng
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3]mmc: implemented runti
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:14 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > There are 5 "do not initialise statics" errors reported by
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl
>
> you probably should fix those. They are due to lines such as:
>
> static int pad_input_to_usb_pkt = 0;
>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, zhangfei gao wrote:
>
>> >From b7be39e0bbac3950057078ac66900ebc0871f77e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhangfei Gao
>> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:02:47 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: clear all interrupt in suspend befo
26 matches
Mail list logo
