Re: hard wired wifi chip on sdio

2011-04-30 Thread Wolfram Sang
> I have a Freescale iMX25 based (tx25) board with a Marvell 8688 > wireless module on sdio bus. > My kernel is a rel_imx_2.6.35_11.03.00 from Freescale git repository. Please either a) use a _recent vanilla_ kernel or b) ask Freescale about their kernel directly. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengu

Re: [PATCH] dw_mmc: fixed regulator control

2011-04-30 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Jaehoon, On Fri, Apr 29 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > This patch fixed regulator control in dw_mmc.c > If we didn't set CONFIG_REGULATOR, always entered error condition. > But that's not error..because we didn't use regulator framework. > > So when we only used CONFIG_REGULATOR, i think that nee

hard wired wifi chip on sdio

2011-04-30 Thread zamek
Hi All, I have a Freescale iMX25 based (tx25) board with a Marvell 8688 wireless module on sdio bus. My kernel is a rel_imx_2.6.35_11.03.00 from Freescale git repository. The wireless chip is hard wired on sdio bus, not plugged in. On end of sdhci_probe_slot() function I call the tasklet_sc

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Conditionalize regulator_get() on CONFIG_REGULATOR

2011-04-30 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Lars, On Sat, Apr 30 2011, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 04/30/2011 06:35 AM, Chris Ball wrote: >> The regulator subsystem provides stubbed out versions of its calls that >> are always present (so that they can be used without needing #ifdefs). >> But the regulator_get() stub always returns an

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Conditionalize regulator_get() on CONFIG_REGULATOR

2011-04-30 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 04/30/2011 06:35 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > The regulator subsystem provides stubbed out versions of its calls that > are always present (so that they can be used without needing #ifdefs). > But the regulator_get() stub always returns an error value according > to IS_ERR(), which leads sdhci to pri