On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:48:56 -0700
> Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> dmaengine expands the class of dma providers to include standalone dma
>> agents on a host bus (or elsewhere) in addition to the traditional bus
>> mastering host-bus-adapters th
>>
>> This method is used in v1,
>> The method makes sdhci_ops non-const and have to dynamically alloc
>> sdhci_ops, since host->ops is pointer.
>> Will keep use const sdhci_ops, recommended by Arnd.
>
>
> Not acceptable.
>
>
> There are 3 cases for WP signal
>
> a) They are connected to the cont
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:48:56 -0700
Dan Williams wrote:
> dmaengine expands the class of dma providers to include standalone dma
> agents on a host bus (or elsewhere) in addition to the traditional bus
> mastering host-bus-adapters that the existing api understands. So in
> the case of slave dma t
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:56 PM, zhangfei gao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>>
>> On May 29, 2011, at 10:42 PM, zhangfei gao wrote:
>>
There is a little room for simplification, I think:
> +static unsigned int mmp2_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host
Eanble the ADMA2 mode on freescale esdhc imx driver,
tested on MX51 and MX53.
Only ADMA2 mode is enabled, MX25/35 can't support the ADMA2 mode.
So this patch is only used for MX51/53.
The ADMA2 mode supported or not can be distinguished by the
Capability Register(offset 0x40) of eSDHC module.
Up t
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>
>>> How about changing the title of the option though? A user will
>>> usually not know if he is using the v2 or v3 controller without
>>> reading the help text. If you change it to
>>>
>>> co
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2011, at 10:42 PM, zhangfei gao wrote:
>
>>>
>>> There is a little room for simplification, I think:
>>>
+static unsigned int mmp2_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
+{
+ /* Micro SD does not support write-protect
On May 29, 2011, at 10:42 PM, zhangfei gao wrote:
>>
>> There is a little room for simplification, I think:
>>
>>> +static unsigned int mmp2_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Micro SD does not support write-protect feature */
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> You shouldn't nee
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Like dma_set(get)_max_seg_size for max_segment_size, the patch adds
> max_segment_number into device_dma_parameters and creates the
> corresponding dmaengine API dma_set(get)_max_seg_number for it.
>
> Here is the user story that tells the need o
thanks.
second report.
can you send out whole boot log.
Yinghai
On 06/07/2011 01:06 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 07.06.2011 20:36, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the commit "PCI: update bridge resources to get more big ranges when
> allocating space (again)"
>
> http://git.kernel.or
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 5 June 2011 14:48, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Sending a reset is necessary only if we are re-initing a powered on
>> card, but in this case, we know that we just powered the card up, so
>> this is not needed.
>
> Don't ask me for an explanati
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Also, the most frustrating thing when working on this issue is that
> the codepaths for powering up a SD card between the following 3
> situations are significantly different:
> 1. Power up and probe during boot
> 2. Resume from suspend
> 3.
On 06.06.2011 21:56, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Mon, Jun 06 2011, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
dmesg is a bit more detailed:
[6.242510] sdhci-pci :03:00.1: SDHCI controller found [1180:e822]
(rev 3)
[6.244168] sdhci-pci :03:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level
At http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10748 we are seeing a case of the
libertas firmware randomly stopping responding to commands after
resume. Careful monitoring of communications indicates a firmware or
hardware bug, which has been reported to Marvell.
Work around this issue by adding a reset_card me
On 5 June 2011 14:48, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Reset the card by performing the same steps that are taken by
>> + * mmc_rescan_try_freq() and mmc_attach_sdio() during a "normal"
>> probe
>> + */
>> + sdio_reset(host);
>
> Sending a reset is necess
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>> How about changing the title of the option though? A user will
>> usually not know if he is using the v2 or v3 controller without
>> reading the help text. If you change it to
>>
>> config MMC_SDHCI_PXAV2
>>tristate "Marvell PXA168 SD Host
Hi Ohad,
Am 04.06.2011 00:52, schrieb Ohad Ben-Cohen:
> (cc'ing Arnd Hannermann)
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Bing Zhao wrote:
>> "CMD5 Arg=0" refers to the very first CMD5 sent from host during
>> initialization sequence.
>> This is required because our state machine always expects two
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Sorry, I don't have the hardware anymore so I'm not able to check this.
Ok, thanks for the reply !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo i
Hi,
I have an android box, and the kernel is 2.6.32. and my sd card
host driver use the sdhci driver.
now I have a problem when sdhost suspend and resume.
>From the log, after the system suspend, just before sdhost resume,
there is a sdhci_request io happen. in the sdhci_request, it st
Eanble the ADMA2 mode on freescale esdhc imx driver,
tested on MX51 and MX53.
Only ADMA2 mode is enabled, MX25/35 can't support the ADMA2 mode.
So this patch is only used for MX51/53.
The ADMA2 mode supported or not can be distinguished by the
Capability Register(offset 0x40) of eSDHC module.
Up t
> How about changing the title of the option though? A user will
> usually not know if he is using the v2 or v3 controller without
> reading the help text. If you change it to
>
> config MMC_SDHCI_PXAV2
> tristate "Marvell PXA168 SD Host Controller support (PXAV2)"
> default CPU_PXA16
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:08:27 zhangfei gao wrote:
> >> +config MMC_SDHCI_PXAV2
> >> + tristate "Marvell PXAV2 SD Host Controller support"
> >> + select MMC_SDHCI
> >> + select MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
> >> + help
> >> + This selects the Marvell(R) PXAV2 SD Host Controller.
> >> +
On 1 June 2011 16:30, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
>> in CCCR_INTx is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 5 +
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 07:44:42 zhangfei gao wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Philip Rakity wrote:
> >
> > Please update mmp2 and pxa defconfigs.
>
> The trend is replacing defconfig with device tree, it may not
> acceptable to update defconfig.
Actually, the defconfigs are not going aw
24 matches
Mail list logo
