The individual SoC dependency in Kconfig hardly scales anymore.
Instead of having such a fine grained dependency just depend
on ARCH_MXC and risk that the uninformed user has to look in
the help text to figure out which driver is the correct one.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer
Cc: Chris Ball
Cc: li
Hosts which support re-tuning mode 2 has the capability to indicate
the re-tuning timing by issuing re-tuning request during data transfers.
During non-data transfers, re-tuning timing is determined by either
re-tuning timer or re-tuning request.
Since there is no way to determine the host's capab
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, NamJae Jeon wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am wordering why mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq() and
> mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq() is seperated.
> So I try to make mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq() and
> mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq() effectively merged into one.
>
> I want to know your
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:57:18PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> The SDHI driver already supports making use of up to three interrupt
> sources.
>
> This series breaks up the existing interrupt handler into three handlers,
> one for card access, one for card detect interrupts, and one for SDIO
> in
Hi.
I am wordering why mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq() and
mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq() is seperated.
So I try to make mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq() and
mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq() effectively merged into one.
I want to know your opinion.
Thanks.
-
On 08/23/2011 09:56 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
[Adding linux-sparse@ to CC]
On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
Fix the sparse warning output
"warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
---
d
Josh Triplett writes:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:04:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Josh Triplett writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> >> > - struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
>> >> > + struct mm
>
> I'm still a little confused -- the {0} or memset(0, struct ..);
> formations are used often in the kernel, even with pointers involved.
> Is the warning (Wnon_pointer_null) run against the kernel by default,
> or did Venkatraman add it manually? If default, is it catching bugs?
Did a quick "
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:28:42PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > {} produces the same effect, as far as I know.
>
> Yeah. I prefer {0}, because {} is a gcc-ism (the ANSI grammar demands
> initializer-lists be non-empty) and is less readable for
Josh Triplett writes:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> > - struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
>> > + struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
>>
>> The sparse warning is mistaken. Or I'm mistaken. But I suspect it's
>> the spars
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Grant Likely
>
> Add hooks to read gpio configuration out of the device tree node.
>
> [grant.likely: Rewrite of original patch from John Bonesio]
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
> [swarren: Fixed tegra_sdhci_get_ro() to retrieve pdata
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> {} produces the same effect, as far as I know.
Yeah. I prefer {0}, because {} is a gcc-ism (the ANSI grammar demands
initializer-lists be non-empty) and is less readable for people who
haven't seen the idiom before and are wondering what's going on
Stephen Warren wrote at Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:17 PM:
> The active platform data pointer is stored as pltfm_host->priv, and not
> always in the platform device itself. In particular, the platform data in
> the platform device is NULL when the platform data comes from Device Tree.
>
> Signed-o
From: Grant Likely
Add hooks to read gpio configuration out of the device tree node.
[grant.likely: Rewrite of original patch from John Bonesio]
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
[swarren: Fixed tegra_sdhci_get_ro() to retrieve pdata correctly]
[swarren: Reworked to avoid #ifdef CONFIG_OF]
[swarren:
The bindings were recently updated to be more in-line with other SDHCI
bindings that are already merged.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts | 12 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts |6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:04:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
> >> > -struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
> >> > +struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
> >>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> So we're not assigning 0 to a pointer, or whatever sparse thinks we're
>> doing -- we're initializing every member of the struct with 0, which is
>> a good and safe way to initialize it.
>>
>> Sparse folks, any comment?
>
> The struct looks like thi
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Adding linux-sparse@ to CC]
>
> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
> > Fix the sparse warning output
> > "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/card
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Adding linux-sparse@ to CC]
>
> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
> > Fix the sparse warning output
> > "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/card
Hi,
[Adding linux-sparse@ to CC]
On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
> Fix the sparse warning output
> "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
> ---
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c|4 ++--
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c |2 +-
> drivers/mmc/co
Fix the sparse warning output
"warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c|4 ++--
drivers/mmc/core/core.c |2 +-
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c |4 ++--
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_ops.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 6 inserti
Fix the sparse warning "drivers/mmc/card/queue.c:111:20: warning:
symbol 'mmc_alloc_sg' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
---
drivers/mmc/card/queue.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/
Couple of patches to cleanup warnings generated by sparse tool.
Venkatraman S (2):
mmc: queue: declare mmc_alloc_sg as static
mmc: fix integer assignments to pointer
drivers/mmc/card/block.c|4 ++--
drivers/mmc/card/queue.c|2 +-
drivers/mmc/core/core.c |2 +-
drivers
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:16:37PM +0530, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> Both these patches looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Sahitya Tummala
I'll pull these in, then. Thanks.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of th
Hi,
On 23 August 2011 14:20, Shashidhar Hiremath
wrote:
> The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
> It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
> and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in the Interrupt Service
> Routine.
>
> Signed-off-by
The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in the Interrupt Service
Routine.
Signed-off-by: Shashidhar Hiremath
---
v2:
* As per Suggestions by James Hogan
-f
Hi Subhash,
The patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Arindam Nath
Thanks,
Arindam
> -Original Message-
> From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subha...@codeaurora.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 5:14 PM
> To: Nath, Arindam
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] mmc: sd: UHS-I bus speed should be
Hi Alexander,
Both these patches looks good to me.
Acked-by: Sahitya Tummala
Thanks,
Sahitya.
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
On 8/21/2011 5:22 PM, Alexander Tarasikov wrote:
These two
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:57:40AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
From: Ulf Hansson
The end of a dma|pio data transfer is synced with the
DATAEND irq. This will prevent the mmci driver from ending
the request before the dma|pio job is completely done.
For dma we u
Hi
On 23 August 2011 09:38, Shashidhar Hiremath
wrote:
> Resending the patch in plain text format.
>
>
>
> The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
> It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
> and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Shashidhar Hiremath
wrote:
> The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
> It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
> and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in the Interrupt Service
> Routine.
>
> Signed-off
Resending the patch in plain text format.
The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in the Interrupt Service
Routine.
Signed-off-by: shashidhar Hiremath
The Patch adds the support for SDIO interrupts for all slots.
It includes enabling of SDIO interrupts through dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq
and the handling of the slot specific interrupts in the Interrupt Service
Routine.
Signed-off-by: shashidhar Hiremath
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 37
33 matches
Mail list logo
