2011/8/30 Linus Walleij :
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:44 AM, NamJae Jeon wrote:
>
>> If card is infinitely holding pull down busy line(data 0) while
>> writing multiple blocks, write will be blocked in
>> mmc_wait_for_req_done().
>> I suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout instread of
>> wait_
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Reported by Russell King:
>
> mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64,
> cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00
> mmcblk0: retrying using single block read
>
> WARNING: at /home/rmk/git/linux-2.6-rmk/lib/dma-debug.
No need to hold the spinlock during a rather long dma configuration
sequence inside dma callback, which doesn't need it.
Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
---
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/driver
The first patch substitutes the dma_cleanup function in place of
the body of the code which does the same thing. The dma unmap
operation is now restricted just to the post_req function.
The second patch minimizes holding spin lock during dma
configuration, where it is not necessary.
Venkatraman
Reuse omap_hsmmc_dma_cleanup even for normal dma teardown in
omap_hsmmc_dma_cb. Consolidate multiple points of dma unmap into a
single location in post_req function, to prevent double unmapping.
Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S
---
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 20 +---
1 files
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 13:21:23, Ido Yariv wrote:
> The wl1271 daughter card for AM18x EVMs is a combo wireless connectivity
> add-on card, based on the LS Research TiWi module with Texas
> Instruments' wl1271 solution.
> It is a 4-wire, 1.8V, embedded SDIO WLAN device with an external IRQ
> line
* Lin Tony-B19295 [110901 09:34]:
> Chris ball's tree.
Thanks! Merged relevant parts with 2.6.93.4 and the mach-mx3 platform
and now it seems like SDIO interrupts are working fine. Sweet :)
/PH
--
Per-Henrik Lundblom epost: p...@whatever.nu
hemsida: www.whatever.nu
--
To unsubscribe
Hi Girish.
I agreed for Mr.Jeon's opinion.
I think that need not to check for any exception case.
(Mr.Jeon mentioned the below comment, just using default cmd6_timeout)
Thanks,
Jaehoon Chung
Girish K S wrote:
> Hello Mr Jeon,
> In case if the timeout is specified by the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:55 PM
> To: Lin Tony-B19295
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> c...@laptop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-esdhc: Change delay afte
Chris ball's tree.
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Per-Henrik Lundblom
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:46 PM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: sdhci-esdhc-imx and SDIO interrupts
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo