Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09 2011, Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but It seems that additional
> restrictions are imposed on the distribution of the code here [..]
I think you're wrong, because in this case the request is not an
*additional* restriction -- GPLv2 section 1 already d
Hi.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but It seems that additional
restrictions are imposed on the distribution of the code here, which
is explicitly prohibited by the GPL paragraph 6:
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receiv
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:cbouatmai...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 22:07 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; akpm@linux-
> foundation.org; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eSD
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:05:46PM +0800, Roy Zang wrote:
> From: Xu lei
>
> Freescale eSDHC registers only support 32-bit accesses,
> this patch ensures that all Freescale eSDHC register accesses
> are 32-bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu lei
> Signed-off-by: Roy Zang
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Buckley, Bryan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Kishore Kadiyala
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Bryan Buckley wrote:
>> > Remove OMAP4_USBC1_ICUSB_PWRDNZ_MASK during enable/disable PWRDNZ mode for
>> > MMC1_PBIAS and associated extended
> Previously, I sent this patch together with another one. But
> technically they are separated patches. I got some comments from
> Anton about the patch. I will try to address the comment. but for this
> one, it is a stand along patch. I'd like to push it first.
Okay.
> I do not see any comme
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 20:33 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: c...@laptop.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org;
> a...@linux-foundation.org; cbouatmai...@gmail.com; Xu Lei-B33228; K
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:23:05PM +, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote:
> > > Freescale eSDHC registers only support 32-bit accesses,
> > > this patch ensures that all Freescale eSDHC register accesses
> > > are 32-bit.
> >
> > So, what about the byte-swapping that Anton needed? You are simply
> > remov
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 19:40 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; akpm@linux-
> foundation.org; cbouatmai...@gmail.com; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala
> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 19:40 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; akpm@linux-
> foundation.org; cbouatmai...@gmail.com; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala
> Subj
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:05:46PM +0800, Roy Zang wrote:
> From: Xu lei
>
> Freescale eSDHC registers only support 32-bit accesses,
> this patch ensures that all Freescale eSDHC register accesses
> are 32-bit.
So, what about the byte-swapping that Anton needed? You are simply
removing that
From: Xu lei
Freescale eSDHC registers only support 32-bit accesses,
this patch ensures that all Freescale eSDHC register accesses
are 32-bit.
Signed-off-by: Xu lei
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
This is a patch resend
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106245/
based on
> > I would do it in the IO accessors.
> >
> > Thanks,
> Any update for your comment?
It is still valid. You can go that road.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:cbouatmai...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 18:05 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; akpm@linux-
> foundation.org; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject:
14 matches
Mail list logo
