Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivercore: add new error value for deferred probe

2011-10-11 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:06:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:59:31PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:28:33PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > >> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:12:45 MDT, Grant

Re: [PATCH 4/5] gpiolib: handle deferral probe error

2011-10-11 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 04:09:38PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:33:09 +0500 > > "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" wrote: > > > >> > >> The gpio library should return -EPROBE_DEFER in gpio_request > >> if gpio driver is not ready. >

Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add lookup of sdhci-s3c clocks using generic names

2011-10-11 Thread Rajeshwari Birje
Hi Heiko, As mentioned in the cover-letter, these patches are based on UART clkdev patches, hence you need to apply the same before applying these patches. I have made these patches on top of the For-next branch of Kgene's tree, following is the url for the same: git://github.com/kgene/linux-samsu

[PATCH RESEND] mmc: sdhci-s3c: fix wrong error-control

2011-10-11 Thread Jaehoon Chung
If sc->clk_bus[ptr] is NULL, happen NULL pointer error. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c index 8270

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread NamJae Jeon
2011/10/12 Andrei Warkentin : > Hi, > > - Original Message - >> From: "NamJae Jeon" >> To: "Andrei Warkentin" >> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , >> linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" >> , "Stephen Rothwell" , "Randy >> Dunlap" >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:16:51 PM

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread Andrei Warkentin
Hi, - Original Message - > From: "NamJae Jeon" > To: "Andrei Warkentin" > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , > linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" > , "Stephen Rothwell" , "Randy Dunlap" > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:16:51 PM > Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread NamJae Jeon
2011/10/12 Andrei Warkentin : > - Original Message - >> From: "NamJae Jeon" >> To: "Randy Dunlap" , "Andrei Warkentin" >> >> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , >> linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" >> , "Stephen Rothwell" >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:20:48 PM >> Subj

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread Andrei Warkentin
- Original Message - > From: "NamJae Jeon" > To: "Randy Dunlap" , "Andrei Warkentin" > > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , > linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" > , "Stephen Rothwell" > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:20:48 PM > Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency on C

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread NamJae Jeon
2011/10/12 Randy Dunlap : > On 10/11/11 12:31, Andrei Warkentin wrote: >> Hi Randy, >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Randy Dunlap" >>> To: "Stephen Rothwell" >>> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , >>> linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" >>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11,

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/11/11 12:31, Andrei Warkentin wrote: > Hi Randy, > > - Original Message - >> From: "Randy Dunlap" >> To: "Stephen Rothwell" >> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , >> linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" >> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:49:39 PM >> Subject: Re: linu

Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc))

2011-10-11 Thread Andrei Warkentin
Hi Randy, - Original Message - > From: "Randy Dunlap" > To: "Stephen Rothwell" > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, "LKML" , > linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:49:39 PM > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc) > > On 10/11/11 02:11, St

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc)

2011-10-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The linux-next tree is now available from > git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while > the kernel.org servers are unavailable. > > It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The > pat

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: Add OF bindings support for mmc host controller capabilities

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 11 October 2011 21:59, Stephen Warren wrote: > Thomas Abraham wrote at Sunday, October 09, 2011 12:58 AM: >> On 5 October 2011 21:25, Stephen Warren wrote: >> > Thomas Abraham wrote at Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:28 AM: >> >> On 5 October 2011 18:59, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> > On 10/05/2011

RE: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: Add OF bindings support for mmc host controller capabilities

2011-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
Thomas Abraham wrote at Sunday, October 09, 2011 12:58 AM: > On 5 October 2011 21:25, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Thomas Abraham wrote at Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:28 AM: > >> On 5 October 2011 18:59, Rob Herring wrote: > >> > On 10/05/2011 05:13 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > >> >> Device nodes r

Re: [PATCH RESEND V1] mmc: replace printk with appropriate display macro

2011-10-11 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Girish K S wrote: > All the files using printk function for displaying kernel messages > in the mmc driver have been replaced with corresponding macro. Thanks, applied! I haven't been sure how to handle this patch; in general cosmetic patches that touch many parts of man

[PATCH] mmc: mmci: Do not release spinlock in request_end

2011-10-11 Thread Ulf Hansson
The patch "mmc: core: move ->request() call from atomic context", is the reason to why this change is possible. This simplifies the error handling code execution path quite a lot and potentially also fixes some error handling hang problems. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson --- drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-s3c: fix wrong error-control

2011-10-11 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > If sc->clk_bus[ptr] is NULL, happen NULL pointer error. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |6 -- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers

Re: [PATCH V6 RESEND 2/2] mmc: core: Add Poweroff Notify handling eMMC 4.5

2011-10-11 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Girish, On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Girish K S wrote: > This is a very old version of the patch. My latest patch has been > merged with Mr Chung's branch (the one with PULL REQUEST). > These comments have been already taken care. No, that's not the case. Here is the version of the patch on the emmc4

Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

2011-10-11 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Andrei Warkentin wrote: > Hi, > > - Original Message - >> From: "Greg KH" >> To: "Josh Triplett" >> Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" , >> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "Grant Likely" >> , linux-o...@vger.kernel.org, >> linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linu

Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add lookup of sdhci-s3c clocks using generic names

2011-10-11 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi, somehow this did not apply against linux-next for me: error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c:1250 error: arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c:697 error: arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c: patch does not apply error: pat

[PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add lookup of sdhci-s3c clocks using generic names

2011-10-11 Thread Rajeshwari Shinde
Add support for lookup of sdhci-s3c controller clocks using generic names for s3c2416, s3c64xx, s5pc100, s5pv210 and exynos4 SoC's. Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 88 +- arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/clock.c | 85 + arch/a

[PATCH V2 2/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove SDHCI bus clocks from platform data

2011-10-11 Thread Rajeshwari Shinde
The bus clocks previously sent through platform data to SDHCI controller are removed. Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile |1 - arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-sdhci.c| 22 --- arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/Makefile |1

[PATCH V2 1/3] SDHCI: S3C: Use generic clock names for sdhci bus clock options

2011-10-11 Thread Rajeshwari Shinde
This patch modifies the driver to stop depending on the clock names being passed from the platform and switch over to bus clock lookup using generic clock names. Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) dif

[PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add support for sdhci clock lookup using generic names

2011-10-11 Thread Rajeshwari Shinde
This patchset adds support for sdhci controller clock lookup using generic names. With this patchset, there will be no need to pass clock names in sdhci platform data. This patchset depends on the patchset: Add a common macro for creating struct clk_lookup entries V2 Changes: -Added HCLK