Hi Shashidhar,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:32:25PM +0530, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> Just following up since i did not see any response from you on my
> earlier mail.. In previous mail, im not sure whether i gave you enough
> context/background.. So here it goes (apologies in advanc
* Rajendra Nayak [14 19:40]:
> On Tuesday 15 November 2011 03:00 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Rajendra Nayak [04 04:16]:
> >>@@ -1869,6 +1957,14 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
> >>platform_device *pdev)
> >>struct omap_hsmmc_host *host = NULL;
> >>struct resource *
I am getting the following error when trying to use a swap file on a
large 32GB SD card formated with EXT4.
Thanks,
Paul Schilling
Swap file /external_flash_a/swap_file being enabled.
mmc0: Too large timeout requested for CMD38!
mmc0: Too large timeout requested for CMD38!
mmc0: Too large timeout
Hello Girish,
On 11/03/2011 09:21 PM, Girish K S wrote:
> On 3 November 2011 17:24, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Using Linus' master branch, I was testing PM functionality on OMAP3/4
>> and noticed that the MMC driver is now rather noisy during suspend on
>> OMAP3[1], but seems to work.
>>
Hi Girish,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Girish K S
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:30 AM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: c...@laptop.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung-
> s...@vger.ker
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> [ Adding linux-pm mailing list to CC as well ]
>
> Thanks,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
>
> On 11/17/2011 09:19 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17 2011, Sven Neumann wrote:
>>> I've given 3.2-rc2 a try today and the kernel oopsed when
Hi Arnd,
Please forgive me for a lengthy mail.
firstly, the Patch has not added testcases in kernel, but has added
support infrastructure for handling different commands. Function
names are misnomers and “.test_CMD0” should have instead been
“send_CMD0”.
I have tried to express my views in 2 q
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Joe Woodward wrote:
> I'm assuming these changes have already made it to the mainline, and
> therefore are in the 3.2rc2 build I was testing...
Most probably, yeah.
> Is there anything I can do to debug further the problems I'm seeing?
Let's wait for Daniel to
Ohad,
I'm assuming these changes have already made it to the mainline, and therefore
are in the 3.2rc2 build I was testing...
If not do you have links to the patches?
Is there anything I can do to debug further the problems I'm seeing?
Cheers,
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Ohad Ben-Coh
On 11/17/2011 10:18 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 14/11/11 13:12, Per Forlin wrote:
>> Host is claimed as long as there are requests in the block queue
>> and all request are completed successfully. If an error occur release
>> the host in case someone else needs to claim it, for instance if the ca
On 11/17/2011 04:56 AM, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 4:34 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> If max_seg_size is unaligned, mmc_test_map_sg() may create sg element
>> sizes that are not aligned with 512 byte. Fix, align max_seg_size at
>> mmc_test_area_init().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
>> -
Hi Joe,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Joe Woodward wrote:
> Are these workarounds expected to be enough for runtime PM to just "work"?
It definitely works for 12xx, and with Daniel's recent work merged I
think it also works fine for the sd8686 (Daniel, PCMIIW).
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from
(resending as my mailer seems to have decided that the first try was a reply to
"RE: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5
device,"... apologies!)
I have a GUMSTIX Overo (OMAP35xx) with a Marvel 8686 WiFi attached via SDIO
(ok, I think it's actually a Wi2Wi W2CBW003 module c
13 matches
Mail list logo
