On 19 December 2011 22:24, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> minor comments below.
>
> Philip
>
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Girish K S wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for the HS200 mode on the host side.
>> Also enables the tuning feature required when the HS200 mode
>> is selected.
>>
>> c
Hi Sascha,
Can you drop this patch from your tree? This patch is not complete
even for mxs platform/arch code, and will conflict with my mxs
clk-prepare series.
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:50:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> ---
> arch/arm/mach
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c |2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c |2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c b/arch/arm
Hi Rusty,
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:02:02 +, Tony Olech
> wrote:
>> You are right.
>> I don't know how that slipped through
>> Tony Olech
>
> I'm assuming that means you're taking this? Otherwise, please give me
> an acked-by.
Thanks, I'll send this
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, December 18, 2011, Udo Steinberg wrote:
>> When suspending to RAM, I'm getting a bunch of warnings from the PCI layer
>> in Linux-3.2-rc6, which I didn't get with Linux-3.1. Please let me know if
>> I should provide more information ab
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Shmidt
---
drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 24 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
index 393d817..e07d6c9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
@@ -120,
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c |2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c
> index 20ec3bd..9760a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:24:09PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> This one isn't urgent, but I'm not seeing the amba modalias patches
> anywhere yet. Did you have any outstanding concerns which need to be
> resolved?
>
> If you can suggest when/if these are likely to merge that woul
On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
>> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Girish K S
>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:28 PM
>> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: patc...@linar
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Girish K S wrote:
> This patch adds the support of the HS200 bus speed for eMMC 4.5 devices.
> The eMMC 4.5 devices have support for 200MHz bus speed. The function
> prototype of the tuning function is modified to handle the tuning command
> number which is different
HI,
minor comments below.
Philip
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Girish K S wrote:
> This patch adds support for the HS200 mode on the host side.
> Also enables the tuning feature required when the HS200 mode
> is selected.
>
> cc: Chris Ball
> Signed-off-by: Girish K S
> ---
> drivers/mmc/ho
Host may now use MMC_CAP2_NO_SLEEP_CMD to disable the use
of eMMC sleep/awake command.
This option can be used when you platform have a buggy
kernel crash dump software, which is supposed to store
the dump on the eMMC, but is not able to wake up the eMMC
from sleep state.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hanss
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Hansson
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:28 PM
> To: Subhash Jadavani
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; 'Chris Ball'; Per FORLIN; Johan RUDHOLM;
> 'Lee Jones'
> Subj
Hi Russell,
This one isn't urgent, but I'm not seeing the amba modalias patches
anywhere yet. Did you have any outstanding concerns which need to be
resolved?
If you can suggest when/if these are likely to merge that would be great.
Since Alessandro is now expecting to have to rebase on top of
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:34 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> You didn't mean this to be a bool.
>
> Cc: Tony Olech
> Cc: Chris Ball
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 inser
If you got this half written reply, please ignore it.
BR
Ulf Hansson
Ulf Hansson wrote:
Vitaly Wool wrote:
Hi,
I did some measurement, having two eMMC connected (one of them with a
root file system mounted) and one rather good SD-card with VFAT. The
resume time for the kernel before these p
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[snip]
2.
When executing mmc/sd commands/requests the host must always be claimed
(and thus the host is always enabled).
Why? Why cannot we save some power betwe
Subhash Jadavani wrote:
On 12/19/2011 4:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Subhash Jadavani wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Hansson
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:06 PM
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
On 12/19/2011 4:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Subhash Jadavani wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Hansson
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:06 PM
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Chris Ball
Cc: Per For
Subhash Jadavani wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Hansson
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:06 PM
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Chris Ball
Cc: Per Forlin; Ulf Hansson; Johan Rudholm; Lee Jones
S
Vitaly Wool wrote:
Hi,
I did some measurement, having two eMMC connected (one of them with a
root file system mounted) and one rather good SD-card with VFAT. The
resume time for the kernel before these patches were around 600 ms.
After my patches I had around 20 ms.
What do you call "resume
> -Original Message-
> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 4:20 PM
> To: Subhash Jadavani
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung-
> s...@vger.kernel.org; Chris Ball
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] mmc: core:
On 19 December 2011 15:40, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> Hi Girish,
>
> Overall this patch looks good. I have only 2 minor comments inline below.
>
> Regards,
> Subhash
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
>> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Hi,
Chris Ball laptop.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung samsung.com>
> >
> > On 11/22/2011 03:00 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> >> Now that the driver is using dev_pm_ops the suspend operations in the
> >> platform_driver structure won
Hi Girish,
Overall this patch looks good. I have only 2 minor comments inline below.
Regards,
Subhash
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Girish K S
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:07 PM
> To: linux-m
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> (it seems there are a few different hw revisions of it, some
> of which do require toggling the reset pin before sending another init
> sequence)
(it might just be different setups and not really different hw
revisions of the 8686)
--
To u
Hello Bing,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Bing Zhao wrote:
>> I wonder why the sdio reset command isn't helpful for you - it did
>> seem to resolve some issues for Daniel. Maybe you have two different
>> hardware revisions of the 8686 which behave differently in this
>> respect ?
>
> CMD52 Car
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> My patch simply sets a flag to enable a whole load of code written by
>> you - code which I understand little about. I am now available to
>> help, but given that my underst
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:35:54PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
When getting a cmd irq during an ongoing data transfer
with dma, the dma job were never terminated. This is now
corrected.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
I've queued this up in
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
The interrupt was previously enabled and then correctly cleared.
Now we also handle it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
I've queued this in my 'fixes' branch with a Cc t
30 matches
Mail list logo
