Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove old and misprototyped suspend operations

Hi Jaehoon, On 12/26/2011 10:53 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: Hi Tushar. Did you test with linux-3.2-rc6? I checked the linux-3.2-rc6..that version may be missed the dev_pm_ops patch.. (Manuel's patch [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci: remove "state" argument from sdhci_suspend_host) I didn't understand this

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove old and misprototyped suspend operations

Hi Tushar. Did you test with linux-3.2-rc6? I checked the linux-3.2-rc6..that version may be missed the dev_pm_ops patch.. (Manuel's patch [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci: remove "state" argument from sdhci_suspend_host) I didn't understand this condition. That patch is include in linux-3.2-rc7. To Chri

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove old and misprototyped suspend operations

Hi Jaehoon, On 12/26/2011 07:24 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: Hi Tushar. I also tested this patch with Samsung-SoC. But i didn't find the below message "mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt." When the primary filesystem is on SD/MMC card, I need to select following config options for the s

RE: [PATCH V2 1/2] SD/MMC: add an interface to re-initialize bounce buffer

Hi Chris, Happy holidays! How about this patch? And "[PATCH V2 2/2] mmc/doc: feature description of runtime bounce buffer size adjustment"? I add the description in Documents/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt according to your suggestion. Thanks for your reply. -Original Message- From: Liu Qiang-

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove old and misprototyped suspend operations

Hi Tushar. I also tested this patch with Samsung-SoC. But i didn't find the below message "mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt." I didn't understand what is that differ with previously code? (just using dev_pm_ops..) Thanks, Jaehoon Chung On 12/25/2011 11:29 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > H

Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] mmc: sh_mmcif: process requests asynchronously

Hi, On Sun, Dec 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hmmm, that's very weird - I rebased my patch series on top of your > mmc-next from a couple of hours ago. Sorry for asking, but you've also > applied the leading two patches from this series, right? This is what my > log of this driver loo

Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] mmc: sh_mmcif: process requests asynchronously

Hi Chris On Sun, 25 Dec 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Sun, Dec 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> This patch (3/4) no longer applies to mmc-next -- mind resending? > > > > This one should be ok. > > Seems to be worse, for some reason: > > patching file drivers/mmc/host/

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] mmc: add a generic GPIO card-detect helper

Hi, On Sun, Dec 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > This patch adds a primitive helper to support card hotplug detection on > platforms, where a GPIO, capable of producing interrupts, is used for > detection of card-insertion and -removal events. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > ---

Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] mmc: sh_mmcif: process requests asynchronously

Hi Guennadi, On Sun, Dec 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> This patch (3/4) no longer applies to mmc-next -- mind resending? > > This one should be ok. Seems to be worse, for some reason: patching file drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 189 (offset -5 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED

[PATCH 2/2 v2] mmc: add a generic GPIO card-detect helper

This patch adds a primitive helper to support card hotplug detection on platforms, where a GPIO, capable of producing interrupts, is used for detection of card-insertion and -removal events. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski --- v2: switch to use snprintf() Hi Chris On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Chr

[PATCH 3/4 v3] mmc: sh_mmcif: process requests asynchronously

This patch converts the sh_mmcif MMC host driver to process requests asynchronously instead of waiting in its .request() method for completion. This is achieved by using threaded IRQs. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski --- v3: updated on top of current mmc-next Hi Chris On Sat, 24 Dec 2011,