Hi Doug,
On Thursday, November 29, 2012, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> Thanks for the review. See below for comments. If you'd like me to
> respin then please let me know. Otherwise I look forward to your ack.
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > Yes. pin of w
Hi James,
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/11/12 10:26, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > Even though HLE interrupt is enabled, there is no touch.
> > This patch clears HLE interrupt which is not unhandled.
>
> It's not entirely clear from this description what the patc
Hi chris,
Sorry to miss this mail.
Patch V4 for this patch had resend. Pls review.
Thanks.
Regards
Haijun.
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Ball
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:56 AM
> To: Hua
Sorry, I forget to add patch version.
Discard this patch. Another had send.
Regards
Haijun.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang Haijun-B42677
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:22 PM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang Haijun-B42677; Huang Changming-R66093; Chris Ball
> Subjec
As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assign the
timeout_clk and max_discard_to according to the max_dtr which
ca
As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assign the
timeout_clk and max_discard_to according to the max_dtr which
ca
Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov
CC: Chris Ball
---
changes for v4:
- Correct inconsistent issue
changes for v3:
- Correct the if statement in function workground
changes for v2:
- Invert the condition of the if statement
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:48:22PM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
> So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
> issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
> SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assig
Thanks Anton
Please review.
Regards
Haijun.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang Haijun-B42677
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:48 PM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang Haijun-B42677; Huang Changming-R66093; Anton Vorontsov
> Subject: [PATCH] Powerpc/eSDHC: Calculate the a
As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assign the
timeout_clk and max_discard_to according to the max_dtr which
ca
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:00:16PM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
> So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
> issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
> SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assig
As large area erase needs long time usually a few minutes,
So we use max_discard_to to limit the size one request can
issue to avoid timeout. As our controller had the quirk
SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK so we need to assign the
timeout_clk and max_discard_to according to the max_dtr which
ca
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 21:31 -0500, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun
>
> The dereference to 'of_id' should be moved below the NULL test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/wmt-sdmmc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/
From: Wei Yongjun
The dereference to 'of_id' should be moved below the NULL test.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
drivers/mmc/host/wmt-sdmmc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/wmt-sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/wmt-sdmmc.c
index 5ba4605..f737b0c
From: Marko Katic
Here's an interesting scenario. The spitz machine has an
Intersil 6271A voltage regulator and an ADS7846 touchscreen
controller. The ADS7846 driver requires the use of the voltage regulator
or if not present, CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY should be used for proper operation.
So to supp
Seungwon,
Thanks for the review. See below for comments. If you'd like me to
respin then please let me know. Otherwise I look forward to your ack.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Yes. pin of write protection is common property.
> This change is good. I have some sugges
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:55:13PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
> I have tried to work out an if-statement to check this properly. Here
> is my conclusion,
> This only works if sg len is 1 (in the SDIO case)
>
> if (WRITE)
> align = sg->offset & 3
> else if (READ)
> align = 0
>
> if (sg->offset &
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Per Förlin wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 11:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Per Förlin wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2012 06:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 06:28:30PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
Hi Maya,
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> I managed to find a solution in which there is no need to check the number
> of written / discarded sectors as a trigger for BKOPS status check.
> I moved the code that checks the need to stop the BKOPS to mmc/block code,
> in which there
On 21 November 2012 16:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 13:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 16 October 2012 10:17, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>
This code has not been tested on a "legacy" ARM PL180 but only for
ux500 boards. E
Hi,
On 28/11/12 10:26, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Even though HLE interrupt is enabled, there is no touch.
> This patch clears HLE interrupt which is not unhandled.
It's not entirely clear from this description what the patch is trying
to do. I presume from the patch you're trying to say something li
On 28/11/12 10:26, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Use managed device resource functions for easy handling.
> This makes driver simpler in the routine of error and exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon
This looks reasonable to me
Acked-by: James Hogan
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 43 +++
Even though HLE interrupt is enabled, there is no touch.
This patch clears HLE interrupt which is not unhandled.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/
Use managed device resource functions for easy handling.
This makes driver simpler in the routine of error and exit.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 43 ++-
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dri
Yes. pin of write protection is common property.
This change is good. I have some suggestion below.
Could you check it?
On Friday, November 23, 2012, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The exynos code claimed wp-gpio with devm_gpio_request() but never did
> anything with it. That meant that anyone using a wr
During its probing the SDHI driver prints out the clock frequency, but
does it wrongly, always reporting 0Hz. Use the MMC host frequency value
to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
MMCIF only uses one clock, all ARM and SuperH platforms register MMCIF
clock lookup entries with no connection ID, hence it can be dropped in
the driver too.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
SDHI only uses one clock, all ARM and SuperH platform register SDHI clock
lookup entries with no connection ID, hence it can be dropped in the
driver too.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
d
28 matches
Mail list logo
