Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: OCTEON: Add host driver for OCTEON MMC controller

2015-11-24 Thread David Daney
devices. Device parameters are configured from device tree data. eMMC, MMC and SD devices are supported. Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen Signed-off-by: Chandrakala Chavva Signed-off-by: David Daney Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov Signed-off-by: Leonid Rosenboim Signed-off-by: Peter Swain Signed-off

Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: OCTEON: Add host driver for OCTEON MMC controller

2015-03-20 Thread David Daney
Signed-off-by: Chandrakala Chavva Signed-off-by: David Daney Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov Signed-off-by: Leonid Rosenboim Signed-off-by: Peter Swain Signed-off-by: Aaron Williams --- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/octeon-mmc.txt | 69 + drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig

Re: [PATCH] mmc: OCTEON: Add host driver for OCTEON MMC controller

2015-01-19 Thread David Daney
On 01/19/2015 06:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:46:36PM +, Aleksey Makarov wrote: The OCTEON MMC controller is currently found on cn61XX and cnf71XX devices. Device parameters are configured from device tree data. Currenly supported are eMMC, MMC and SD devices.

[PATCH RFC] mmc: Add host driver for OCTEON MMC controller.

2012-05-09 Thread David Daney
From: David Daney The OCTEON MMC controller is currently found on cn61XX and cnf71XX devices. Device parameters are configured from device tree data. Currenly supported are eMMC, MMC and SD devices. Signed-off-by: David Daney --- This patch depends on: http://www.linux-mips.org/archives

Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

2011-10-14 Thread David Daney
On 10/14/2011 12:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:56 PM, David Daney wrote: On 10/14/2011 10:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Alan Stern wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Grant Likely wrote: How can a device acquire children before it has a

Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

2011-10-14 Thread David Daney
;s driver are loaded. A perfect use case for the patch. Would you consider Mux-MDIO to be a 'leaf device'? If not, then I have real problems with 'the limitation that only leaf devices can take advantage of probe deferral' David Daney -- To unsubscribe from this list: send