In commit 3451c067 (mmc: omap: add DMA engine support), some #if 0's
were used to comment out parts of the code. This has been in the code
for over a year and are not needed anymore (and the commented-out code
doesn't even compile). Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho
---
d
pen with ifconfig wlan0 down.
>
> The PBIAS voltage is only available for the first controller
> instance, so let's limit the PBIAS workaround to the first
> controller only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
>
> ---
Tested-by: Luciano Coelho
--
Luca.
--
To unsubscr
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 16:42 -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:58:39PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:58AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 30 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
>
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 14:51 +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter
> >> egg
> >> added there:
> >> f3f98bb ARM: OMAP
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:56 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is
> >> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless
>
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> > Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM
> > fclk
> > clock) for twl6040.
> > Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:28 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
> > I think one of the reasons not many people use the mainline with TWL is
> > exactly because something seems to break on every new kernel release.
> &
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 09:45 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:54:50AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > damn, this is still part of our v3.7-rc kernel. Original commit was done
> > with no testing whatsoever and caused a big regression to (at least)
> > TI's WiFi drive
Hi,
Since the 32KHz clock was removed from the twl-regulator (0e8e5c34
regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings),
we've been having problems with our wl12xx chip that is connected
through the omap_hsmmc.
Our card simply doesn't get added to the system and we get lots of
-
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 12:12 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:26 +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> >> On 11/28/11 11:08, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> > I may do it for panda later on, if I
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:26 +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
Hi Igor,
> On 11/28/11 11:08, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > I may do it for panda later on, if I get the time to test it. For
> > beagle, it doesn't really apply, because the wl12xx support is
> &g
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 10:26 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
> >> Declare support for keeping the power of the wlan chip
> >> while suspended. this is needed for Wakeup-On-Wireless.
> >>
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:18 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to bring up a wl1271 sdio expansion board on beagle with 2.6.37
> and I'm running into a weird problem when enabling MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD.
>
> My patch basically does:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
>
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:01 +0200, ext Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Luciano, Ohad,
>
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > I have tested this on my beagle board with the wl1271 patches that Ohad
> > provided and it seems to be working fine. I
with the wl1271 patches that Ohad
provided and it seems to be working fine. I've also created a small
script to stress test the implementation a little bit and didn't see any
problems.
Tested-by: Luciano Coelho
This is quite an important fix in the wl1271 point-of-view. Chris, do
you t
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:29 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> This patchset introduces runtime PM support to SDIO cards.
I guess this whole patchset should be pulled via the mmc tree, since
there are more mmc patches, if that's fine with Andrew.
I haven't checked the mmc patches, since I'm not v
fter probe returns,
> since at that point power has not been explicitly requested yet
> (i.e. the WLAN interface is still down).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
> ---
Looks fine to me, after considering David's comment and since it's done
in the same way for PCI.
A
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
>
> Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here going through
> the omap tree with the rest of
+++
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/spi/wl12xx.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/wl12xx.h
For the wl1271 part:
Acked-by: Luciano Coelho
For the wl12xx.h and wl1251 parts, this needs to be acked by Kalle Valo.
wn) sdio functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
> ---
Acked-by: Luciano Coelho
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 02:37 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen
>
> Remove SDIO IDs from the driver code since now it is
> included in linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
> ---
Acked-by: Luciano Coelho
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To
21 matches
Mail list logo