[PATCH] mmc: omap: remove unnecessary #if 0's

2013-06-13 Thread Luciano Coelho
In commit 3451c067 (mmc: omap: add DMA engine support), some #if 0's were used to comment out parts of the code. This has been in the code for over a year and are not needed anymore (and the commented-out code doesn't even compile). Remove them. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho --- d

Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix the DT pbias workaround for MMC controllers 2 to 5

2013-04-25 Thread Luciano Coelho
pen with ifconfig wlan0 down. > > The PBIAS voltage is only available for the first controller > instance, so let's limit the PBIAS workaround to the first > controller only. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > > --- Tested-by: Luciano Coelho -- Luca. -- To unsubscr

Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] ARM: edma: add AM33XX support to the private EDMA API

2013-01-31 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 16:42 -0500, Matt Porter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:58:39PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 31 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:58AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 30 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: >

Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-12-19 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 14:51 +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote: > On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter > >> egg > >> added there: > >> f3f98bb ARM: OMAP

Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-12-19 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:56 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is > >> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless >

Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-12-19 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:32 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM > > fclk > > clock) for twl6040. > > Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send

Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-12-19 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:28 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > > I think one of the reasons not many people use the mainline with TWL is > > exactly because something seems to break on every new kernel release. > &

Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-12-19 Thread Luciano Coelho
Hi Mark, On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 09:45 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:54:50AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > damn, this is still part of our v3.7-rc kernel. Original commit was done > > with no testing whatsoever and caused a big regression to (at least) > > TI's WiFi drive

32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc

2012-11-15 Thread Luciano Coelho
Hi, Since the 32KHz clock was removed from the twl-regulator (0e8e5c34 regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings), we've been having problems with our wl12xx chip that is connected through the omap_hsmmc. Our card simply doesn't get added to the system and we get lots of -

Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap: board-sdp4430: declare support for MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER

2011-11-28 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 12:12 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:26 +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > >> On 11/28/11 11:08, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >> > I may do it for panda later on, if I

Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap: board-sdp4430: declare support for MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER

2011-11-28 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:26 +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > Hi Luciano, Hi Igor, > On 11/28/11 11:08, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > I may do it for panda later on, if I get the time to test it. For > > beagle, it doesn't really apply, because the wl12xx support is > &g

Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap: board-sdp4430: declare support for MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER

2011-11-28 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 10:26 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Eliad Peller wrote: > >> Declare support for keeping the power of the wlan chip > >> while suspended. this is needed for Wakeup-On-Wireless. > >>

Re: Setting MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD on mmc2 leads to filesystem problems on mmc1

2011-01-21 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:18 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to bring up a wl1271 sdio expansion board on beagle with 2.6.37 > and I'm running into a weird problem when enabling MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD. > > My patch basically does: > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] SDIO Runtime PM Support

2010-10-07 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:01 +0200, ext Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Luciano, Ohad, > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > I have tested this on my beagle board with the wl1271 patches that Ohad > > provided and it seems to be working fine. I&#x

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] SDIO Runtime PM Support

2010-10-07 Thread Luciano Coelho
with the wl1271 patches that Ohad provided and it seems to be working fine. I've also created a small script to stress test the implementation a little bit and didn't see any problems. Tested-by: Luciano Coelho This is quite an important fix in the wl1271 point-of-view. Chris, do you t

Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] SDIO Runtime PM Support

2010-09-08 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:29 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > This patchset introduces runtime PM support to SDIO cards. I guess this whole patchset should be pulled via the mmc tree, since there are more mmc patches, if that's fine with Andrew. I haven't checked the mmc patches, since I'm not v

Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] wireless: wl1271_sdio: enable Runtime PM

2010-09-08 Thread Luciano Coelho
fter probe returns, > since at that point power has not been explicitly requested yet > (i.e. the WLAN interface is still down). > > Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen > --- Looks fine to me, after considering David's comment and since it's done in the same way for PCI. A

Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] native support for wl1271 on ZOOM

2010-08-02 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM. > > Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here going through > the omap tree with the rest of

Re: [PATCH 08/15] wireless: wl1271: make wl12xx.h common to both spi and sdio

2010-07-06 Thread Luciano Coelho
+++ > 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 include/linux/spi/wl12xx.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/wl12xx.h For the wl1271 part: Acked-by: Luciano Coelho For the wl12xx.h and wl1251 parts, this needs to be acked by Kalle Valo.

Re: [PATCH 10/15] wireless: wl1271: support return value for the set power func

2010-07-06 Thread Luciano Coelho
wn) sdio functions. > > Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen > --- Acked-by: Luciano Coelho -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 02/15] wireless: wl1271: remove SDIO IDs from driver

2010-07-06 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 02:37 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > From: Ohad Ben-Cohen > > Remove SDIO IDs from the driver code since now it is > included in linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h. > > Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen > --- Acked-by: Luciano Coelho -- Cheers, Luca. -- To