Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:54:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> A little "ping"!
>
> Do you want that I re-send you the patch with relevant S-O-B lines or
> you can include them yourself?
Thanks for the ping -- I've pushed this to mmc-next and queued it for
2.6.37 now. This looks l
Le 26/11/2010 12:17, Nicolas Ferre :
> Le 25/11/2010 11:11, Yauhen Kharuzhy :
>> The AT91 MCI has special SDIO transfer types: SDIO block and SDIO byte
>> transfers, but at91_mci driver doesn't use them and handles all SDIO
>> transfers as ordinary MMC block transfers. This causes problems for
>> m
On 12:11 Thu 25 Nov , Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
> The AT91 MCI has special SDIO transfer types: SDIO block and SDIO byte
> transfers, but at91_mci driver doesn't use them and handles all SDIO
> transfers as ordinary MMC block transfers. This causes problems for
> multiple-block SDIO transfers (in
Le 25/11/2010 11:11, Yauhen Kharuzhy :
> The AT91 MCI has special SDIO transfer types: SDIO block and SDIO byte
> transfers, but at91_mci driver doesn't use them and handles all SDIO
> transfers as ordinary MMC block transfers. This causes problems for
> multiple-block SDIO transfers (in particular
The AT91 MCI has special SDIO transfer types: SDIO block and SDIO byte
transfers, but at91_mci driver doesn't use them and handles all SDIO
transfers as ordinary MMC block transfers. This causes problems for
multiple-block SDIO transfers (in particular for 256-bytes blocks).
Fix this situation by
