On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native
> > > hotplug interrupt, beca
Hi Paul
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native
> > hotplug interrupt, because the latter option forces the controller to stay
> > permanently powe
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native
> hotplug interrupt, because the latter option forces the controller to stay
> permanently powered up and enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhove
Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native
hotplug interrupt, because the latter option forces the controller to stay
permanently powered up and enabled.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
It is a kind of an RFC. We do in general prefer SDHI polling to SDHI
