On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:47:45PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > 5 more patches, that fix high register access on sh-mobile in a correct
> > way and implement aggressive clock gating. Marked as RFC because testing
> > on non-SDHI platforms is req
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:47:45PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> 5 more patches, that fix high register access on sh-mobile in a correct
> way and implement aggressive clock gating. Marked as RFC because testing
> on non-SDHI platforms is required! The next step would be to add
> runtime
Hi
5 more patches, that fix high register access on sh-mobile in a correct
way and implement aggressive clock gating. Marked as RFC because testing
on non-SDHI platforms is required! The next step would be to add
runtime-pm to clock gating, but I'm refraining from this for now, because
similar
