On Monday, March 12, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> > a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> > of another device in the same power do
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
> removed from the entire doma
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Alan Stern writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in
>> > case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated
>> > with runtime power m
On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Alan Stern writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in
> > case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated
> > with runtime power management.
>
> Either is better than j
Alan Stern writes:
[...]
> How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in
> case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated
> with runtime power management.
Either is better than just latency, but I would vote for runtime wakeup
latency.
Kevin
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> > The word "wakeup" may refer to many different things, as well as the word
> >> > "resume". :-)
> >>
> >> Yes, but what's the confusion in this case?
> >>
> >> IMO, The existing /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup* meaning is the same
> >> meaning as as fo
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" w
On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > From: Rafael
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >> >
>> >> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. a
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
removed from the entire domain. In that case, the amount of time
nece
On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> >
> >> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> >> > a
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >
>> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
>> > a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:49:24AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
> > Since I've objected to this kind of feature in the past, I'll just say
> > for the record that I'm fine with selectively exposing this particular
> > knob.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin
On Thursday, March 08, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> > a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> > of another device in the same powe
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> > a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> > of another device in the same power domain
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:49:24AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Since I've objected to this kind of feature in the past, I'll just say
> for the record that I'm fine with selectively exposing this particular
> knob.
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman
I agree with everything Kevin said:
Reviewed-by: M
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
> a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
> of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
> removed from the entire domai
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
removed from the entire domain. In that case, the amount of time
nece
18 matches
Mail list logo
