We don't need to verify the content of the status register twice, while
we are about to handle a DATA irq. Instead let's leave all verification
to be handled by mmci_data_irq().
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
index 6483c5c..a723ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
@@ -888,6 +888,10 @@ static void
mmci_data_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
unsigned int status)
{
+ /* Make sure we have data to handle */
+ if (!data)
+ return;
+
/* First check for errors */
if (status & (MCI_DATACRCFAIL|MCI_DATATIMEOUT|MCI_STARTBITERR|
MCI_TXUNDERRUN|MCI_RXOVERRUN)) {
@@ -1206,7 +1210,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mmci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
do {
struct mmc_command *cmd;
- struct mmc_data *data;
status = readl(host->base + MMCISTATUS);
@@ -1232,11 +1235,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mmci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
MCI_CMDSENT|MCI_CMDRESPEND) && cmd)
mmci_cmd_irq(host, cmd, status);
- data = host->data;
- if (status & (MCI_DATACRCFAIL|MCI_DATATIMEOUT|MCI_STARTBITERR|
- MCI_TXUNDERRUN|MCI_RXOVERRUN|MCI_DATAEND|
- MCI_DATABLOCKEND) && data)
- mmci_data_irq(host, data, status);
+ mmci_data_irq(host, host->data, status);
/* Don't poll for busy completion in irq context. */
if (host->busy_status)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
