Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] mmc: pwrseq: Initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider

2015-02-10 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > >>> +int mmc_pwrseq_simple_alloc(struct mmc_host *host, struct device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct mmc_pwrseq_simple *pwrseq; >>> + >>> + pwrseq = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_pwrseq_simple), GFP_KERNEL); >>> + if (!pwrseq)

Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] mmc: pwrseq: Initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider

2015-02-10 Thread Ulf Hansson
[...] >> +int mmc_pwrseq_simple_alloc(struct mmc_host *host, struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct mmc_pwrseq_simple *pwrseq; >> + >> + pwrseq = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_pwrseq_simple), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!pwrseq) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + pwrseq->pwr

Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] mmc: pwrseq: Initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider

2015-02-10 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > To add the core part for the MMC power sequence, let's start by adding > initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider. > > In this initial step, the MMC power sequence node are fetched and the > compatible string for the simple MM

Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] mmc: pwrseq: Initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider

2015-01-28 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Ulf, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > To add the core part for the MMC power sequence, let's start by adding > initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider. > > In this initial step, the MMC power sequence node are fetched and the > compatible string for

[PATCH V4 3/4] mmc: pwrseq: Initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider

2015-01-19 Thread Ulf Hansson
To add the core part for the MMC power sequence, let's start by adding initial support for the simple MMC power sequence provider. In this initial step, the MMC power sequence node are fetched and the compatible string for the simple MMC power sequence provider are verified. At this point we don'