Hi Arnd,
(Diff truncated to show relevant hunks.)
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
> index dbd4368..90b86e5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad
>> > that
>> > we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for m
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:45:07PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > +- cd-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted
> > > +- wp-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted
> > I'm not sure about those tw
On Friday 30 March 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
> That property looks very reasonable.
>
> Question: This would be a non-backwards-compatible change to the binding
> definition. How should this be handled? In the past, I believe it's been
> stated that new kernels need to run against old device tre
On 03/30/2012 05:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad
>>> that
>>> we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for mmc. We hav
On Friday 30 March 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad
> > that
> > we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for mmc. We have
> > bindings being proposed or already include
On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad that
> we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for mmc. We have
> bindings being proposed or already included from Anton, Stephen, Shawn,
> Rajendra, Viresh, Lee and
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> +
> +Optional Board Specific Properties:
> +- samsung,sdhci-bus-width: Number of data lines connected to the controller.
> + Note: This excludes the clock,command and card detect lines. If this
> property
> + is not specified, default value is
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> +
> +Optional Board Specific Properties:
> +- samsung,sdhci-bus-width: Number of data lines connected to the controller.
> + Note: This excludes the clock,command and card detect lines. If this
> property
> + is not specified, default value is
On 31.01.2012 18:56, Thomas Abraham wrote:
Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's sdhci controller
Works fine on "nuri hardware" using exynos4-dt (with custom dts).
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:26:16PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's sdhci controller
>
> Cc: Ben Dooks
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung-sdhci.txt | 70 +
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's sdhci controller
Cc: Ben Dooks
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung-sdhci.txt | 70 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 148 +++-
2 files changed, 212 insert
12 matches
Mail list logo