On 28-9-2010 11:34, zhangfei gao wrote:
>
> Just curious how to get 40, which is slowest speed for
> initializaion, is this OK for all card?
>
Hi Zhangfei,
It looks as if you missed another thread about f_min recently?
See: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/177932/
This was in response to
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> zhangfei gao wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> zhangfei gao wrote:
index 5db49b1..9114c87 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -910,9 +910,9 @@ static void
zhangfei gao wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> zhangfei gao wrote:
>>> index 5db49b1..9114c87 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> @@ -910,9 +910,9 @@ static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> if (host->f_min
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> zhangfei gao wrote:
>> From fa357144df43e6c1a9e5e36af497c53437cd41e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhangfei Gao
>> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:12:26 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: fix init f_min
>>
>> Change-Id: I7fab1a1a162d9f26fc92c4
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> zhangfei gao wrote:
>> From fa357144df43e6c1a9e5e36af497c53437cd41e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhangfei Gao
>> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:12:26 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: fix init f_min
>>
>> Change-Id: I7fab1a1a162d9f26fc92c4
zhangfei gao wrote:
> From fa357144df43e6c1a9e5e36af497c53437cd41e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhangfei Gao
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:12:26 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: fix init f_min
>
> Change-Id: I7fab1a1a162d9f26fc92c497078f26912c04a3fc
What's this line in the description for?
>From fa357144df43e6c1a9e5e36af497c53437cd41e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhangfei Gao
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:12:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: fix init f_min
Change-Id: I7fab1a1a162d9f26fc92c497078f26912c04a3fc
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c |4 ++--
1