Hi Andrei,
On Mon, Apr 11 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> ERASE command needs R1B response, so fix R1B-type command
> handling for SDHCI controller. For non-DAT commands using a busy
> reponse, the cmd->cmd_timeout_ms (in ms) field is used for timeout
> calculations.
>
> Based on patch by Chuanxia
Hi!
> > Yes, if all the consumers of mmc_command memset the structure to 0, there
> > will be no problem. But just reviewed the code, and found mmc_app_cmd() (in
> > sd_ops.c) didn't memset the command structure. So I think if we can make
> > sure all the command structures will be initialized befo
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Dong, Chuanxiao
wrote:
> Yes, if all the consumers of mmc_command memset the structure to 0, there
> will be no problem. But just reviewed the code, and found mmc_app_cmd() (in
> sd_ops.c) didn't memset the command structure. So I think if we can make sure
> al
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrei Warkentin [mailto:andr...@motorola.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:05 AM
> To: Dong, Chuanxiao
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; a...@arndb.de; c...@laptop.org
> Subject: Re: [patchv3 2/4] MMC: SDHCI R1B command handling
: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: a...@arndb.de; c...@laptop.org; Andrei Warkentin
>> Subject: [patchv3 2/4] MMC: SDHCI R1B command handling + MMC_CAP_ERASE.
>>
>> ERASE command needs R1B response, so fix R1B-type command
>> handling for SDHCI controller. For non-DAT commands
Subject: [patchv3 2/4] MMC: SDHCI R1B command handling + MMC_CAP_ERASE.
>
> ERASE command needs R1B response, so fix R1B-type command
> handling for SDHCI controller. For non-DAT commands using a busy
> reponse, the cmd->cmd_timeout_ms (in ms) field is used for timeout
> calculations
ERASE command needs R1B response, so fix R1B-type command
handling for SDHCI controller. For non-DAT commands using a busy
reponse, the cmd->cmd_timeout_ms (in ms) field is used for timeout
calculations.
Based on patch by Chuanxiao Dong
Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci
