On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:58:54 -0500
"Madhusudhan" wrote:
> Okay. Thanks for the info. I would like to read those discussions and the
> patches, any reference? Or where do I look for them and any good way to
> search such threads in general?
>
The subjects have been a bit unclear unfortunately, bu
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Hunter [mailto:adrian.hun...@nokia.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 2:18 AM
> To: Madhusudhan
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: MMC retry mechanism
>
> Madhusudhan wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
>
Madhusudhan wrote:
Hi Adrian,
With respect to the below commit, It looks like currently the retry
mechanism only handles the READ path.
I wonder could a similar retry logic feasible for the WRITE path?
Regards,
Madhu
From my point of view, writes should never fail. In theory, the MMC
shou
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre Ossman [mailto:pierre-l...@ossman.eu]
> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:21 AM
> To: Madhusudhan
> Cc: 'Adrian Hunter'; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: MMC retry mechanism
>
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:08:05 -0500
"Madhusudhan" wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> With respect to the below commit, It looks like currently the retry
> mechanism only handles the READ path.
>
> I wonder could a similar retry logic feasible for the WRITE path?
>
The claim is that doing so can break some
Hi Adrian,
With respect to the below commit, It looks like currently the retry
mechanism only handles the READ path.
I wonder could a similar retry logic feasible for the WRITE path?
Regards,
Madhu
commit 6a79e391df295bd7c2aa1309ea5031f361c197fd
Author: Adrian Hunter
Date: Wed Dec 31 18:2
