On 5 October 2012 18:50, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Sep 13 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> From: Ulf Hansson
>>
>> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
>> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the eMMC4.5
>> Power Off Notification feature so it fits together with
>
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, Sep 13 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Ulf Hansson
>
> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the eMMC4.5
> Power Off Notification feature so it fits together with
> the existing sleep feature.
>
> The CMD0 based re-ini
On 4 October 2012 20:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 3 October 2012 23:03, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> From: Ulf Hansson
>>>
>>> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
>>> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the
Hi Chris,
On 3 October 2012 23:03, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Sep 13 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> From: Ulf Hansson
>>
>> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
>> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the eMMC4.5
>> Power Off Notification feature so it fits toge
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, Sep 13 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Ulf Hansson
>
> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the eMMC4.5
> Power Off Notification feature so it fits together with
> the existing sleep feature.
>
> The CMD0 based re-ini
On 30 September 2012 16:07, Girish K S wrote:
> On 30 September 2012 15:48, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tanya,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for helping out!!!
>>
>> NP.
>>>
>>> Testing suspend to ram, and then resuming back again is the key use case
>> to
>>> test.
>>
>>
>> Is there a
On 30 September 2012 15:48, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
>>
>> Hi Tanya,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for helping out!!!
>
> NP.
>>
>> Testing suspend to ram, and then resuming back again is the key use case
> to
>> test.
>
>
> Is there a special scenario to trigger suspend or just leaving the system
>
Hi Ulf,
>
> Hi Tanya,
>
> Thanks a lot for helping out!!!
NP.
>
> Testing suspend to ram, and then resuming back again is the key use case
to
> test.
Is there a special scenario to trigger suspend or just leaving the system
idle? I did that. Added prints in the code to verify that the PON w
al Message-
>> From: Ulf Hansson [mailto:ulf.hans...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:40 PM
>> To: Tanya Brokhman
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann; Linus Walleij; Girish K S; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
>> Chris Ball; Per Forlin; Johan Rudholm; Lee Jones;
t; Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Fixup broken suspend and eMMC4.5 power off
> notify
>
> Hi Tanya,
>
> On 20 September 2012 09:58, Tanya Brokhman
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5
> >> &g
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> I am not sure how long we should wait for eMMC 4.5 to be tested. Until
> testing is resolved the eMMC 4.3 and onwards are having a broken
> suspend sequence using SLEEP, which I think is really bad.
To me this sounds like a case for even add
On 20 September 2012 03:35, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Just pinging you to see if you have an opinion in merging this without
>> full testing on eMMC4.5 device?
>>
>> I am kind of eager to fixup the broken suspend for eMMC with sleep,
>> which this does.
Hi Ulf
>
> Nope, this is the only one needed.
> Thanks a lot for helping out!
>
Np.
I understand this is a bit urgent. Will do my best to speed it up...
Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
---
QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Lin
Hi Tanya,
On 20 September 2012 09:58, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> >
>> > Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5
>> > board so maybe he can test it?
>>
>> I have a few eMMC samples but am only using them with my (slow) thinkpad
>> SD card reader. I also don't know which eM
> >
> > Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5
> > board so maybe he can test it?
>
> I have a few eMMC samples but am only using them with my (slow) thinkpad
> SD card reader. I also don't know which eMMC-4.5 features they implement,
> as some may be early prototypes.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Just pinging you to see if you have an opinion in merging this without
> full testing on eMMC4.5 device?
>
> I am kind of eager to fixup the broken suspend for eMMC with sleep,
> which this does. :-)
Well, we don't need "full testing", but I don't thi
Hi Chris,
Just pinging you to see if you have an opinion in merging this without
full testing on eMMC4.5 device?
I am kind of eager to fixup the broken suspend for eMMC with sleep,
which this does. :-)
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
On 17 September 2012 06:50, Girish K S wrote:
> On 14 September 201
On 14 September 2012 20:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S
>> wrote:
>> > On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> Hi Girish,
>> >>
>> >> I should also have stated that this patch has not been t
On Friday 14 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S
> wrote:
> > On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> Hi Girish,
> >>
> >> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
> >> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off not
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S
wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Hi Girish,
>>
>> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
>> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
>> Unfortunate I don't have such
On 14 September 2012 14:49, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 10:25, Girish K S
> wrote:
>> On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> Hi Girish,
>>>
>>> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
>>> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is
On 14 September 2012 10:25, Girish K S wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Hi Girish,
>>
>> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
>> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
>> Unfortunate I don't have such a devi
On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Girish,
>
> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
> Unfortunate I don't have such a device available right now. What I did
> test was that pat
Hi Girish,
I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
Unfortunate I don't have such a device available right now. What I did
test was that patch must not break anything and tested that the
suspend/resu
On 14 September 2012 10:38, Girish K S wrote:
> HI Ulf,
> You had Acked the rework patch mailed by Saugata. But this patch
> doesnt look same like the one sent by saugata.
Sorry Ulf
I saw your and Saugata mail after replying to this.
Pls ignore this
>
> On 13 September 2012 14:50, Ulf Hansson wro
HI Ulf,
You had Acked the rework patch mailed by Saugata. But this patch
doesnt look same like the one sent by saugata.
On 13 September 2012 14:50, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Ulf Hansson
>
> This patch fixup the broken suspend sequence for eMMC
> with sleep support. Additionally it reworks the e
26 matches
Mail list logo
