On 06/15/2012 01:34 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 15 June 2012 16:56, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hi Saugata,
snip.
The problem in sending CMD0 without power OFF notify is possibility of
some data loss in MMC-4.5 devices.
I don't see the problem here. You will be sending power OFF notify when
you
c
On 15 June 2012 16:56, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Saugata,
>
> snip.
>
>
>>
>> The problem in sending CMD0 without power OFF notify is possibility of
>> some data loss in MMC-4.5 devices.
>
>
>
> I don't see the problem here. You will be sending power OFF notify when
>
Hi Saugata,
snip.
The problem in sending CMD0 without power OFF notify is possibility of
some data loss in MMC-4.5 devices.
I don't see the problem here. You will be sending power OFF notify when you
can. The only difference is when you "wake" the device from sleep mode.
Instead of using CM
On 15 June 2012 15:22, Per Forlin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
>> On 15 June 2012 12:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2012 05:49 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
>
> Hi Saugata,
>
> I can have a go and
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
> On 15 June 2012 12:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 05:49 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
Hi Saugata,
I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
c
On 15 June 2012 12:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 05:49 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Saugata,
>>>
>>> I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
>>> concerns that I have with this patch.
>>>
>>> 1. This patch shoul
Hi Ulf,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 05:49 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Saugata,
>>>
>>> I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
>>> concerns that I have with this patch.
>>>
>>>
On 06/15/2012 05:49 AM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
Hi Saugata,
I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
concerns that I have with this patch.
1. This patch should be sent to cc-stable in order to repair the bug
introduced in 3.4
I sh
On 15 June 2012 00:36, Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi Saugata,
>
> I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
> concerns that I have with this patch.
>
> 1. This patch should be sent to cc-stable in order to repair the bug
> introduced in 3.4
I shall sent it out today.
> 2. Is the
Hi Saugata,
I can have a go and test it. But first I would like to bring up 3
concerns that I have with this patch.
1. This patch should be sent to cc-stable in order to repair the bug
introduced in 3.4
2. Is the bus_ops for poweroff_notify really necessary since only mmc
use it? There are alrea
On 14 June 2012 20:20, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Girish,
>
> On 14 June 2012 15:21, Girish K S wrote:
>> On 14 June 2012 18:43, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> Hi Girish and Suagata,
>>>
>>> I have run some regression tests with this patch on our board (ux500
>>> family) running suspend and resume of the eM
Hi Girish,
On 14 June 2012 15:21, Girish K S wrote:
> On 14 June 2012 18:43, Per Forlin wrote:
>> Hi Girish and Suagata,
>>
>> I have run some regression tests with this patch on our board (ux500
>> family) running suspend and resume of the eMMC 4.41 device.
>>
>> The two patches I have looked a
On 14 June 2012 18:43, Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi Girish and Suagata,
>
> I have run some regression tests with this patch on our board (ux500
> family) running suspend and resume of the eMMC 4.41 device.
>
> The two patches I have looked at are:
> 1. "mmc: core: Fix PowerOff Notify suspend/resume" (m
Hi Girish and Suagata,
I have run some regression tests with this patch on our board (ux500
family) running suspend and resume of the eMMC 4.41 device.
The two patches I have looked at are:
1. "mmc: core: Fix PowerOff Notify suspend/resume" (merged)
2. " MMC-4.5 Power OFF Notify Rework"
With onl
On 28 May 2012 16:33, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> Hi Girish, Saugata,
>
> There is an issue with this patch during resume. Please find comments inline
> below:
This is a patch for poweroff_notification. If CAP2 is enabled with
CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY, you never enter the sleep path.
>
>> -Original
On 28 May 2012 16:33, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> Hi Girish, Saugata,
>
> There is an issue with this patch during resume. Please find comments inline
> below:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:15 PM
>> To: l
Hi Girish, Saugata,
There is an issue with this patch during resume. Please find comments inline
below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:15 PM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: c...@laptop.org; patc...@lin
Hi Girish and Saugata,
This patch looks great to me!
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
On 05/22/2012 01:45 PM, Girish K S wrote:
From: Saugata Das
This is a rework of the existing POWER OFF NOTIFY patch. The current problem
with the patch comes from the ambiguity on the usage o
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
On 5/22/2012 5:15 PM, Girish K S wrote:
From: Saugata Das
This is a rework of the existing POWER OFF NOTIFY patch. The current problem
with the patch comes from the ambiguity on the usage of POWER OFF NOTIFY
together with SLEEP and misunderstand
19 matches
Mail list logo
