Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Dong Aisheng, > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +static

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:09 Wed 14 Mar , Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:23:43PM +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > On 16:47 Tue 13 Mar , Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > From: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > --- > > > The patch is still using

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:23:43PM +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:47 Tue 13 Mar , Dong Aisheng wrote: > > From: Dong Aisheng > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > --- > > The patch is still using a private way for dma part binding > > since the common dma bind

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:47 Tue 13 Mar , Dong Aisheng wrote: > From: Dong Aisheng > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > --- > The patch is still using a private way for dma part binding > since the common dma binding is still under discussion. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65528.html > > Will up

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_mmc_dt_ids[

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread s.ha...@pengutronix.de
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_mmc_dt_ids[

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-14 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Dong Aisheng, > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_mmc_dt_ids[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx23-mmc", .data = NULL, }, > > > + { .compat

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-13 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_mmc_dt_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx23-mmc", .data = NULL, }, > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx28-mmc", .data =

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-13 Thread Dong Aisheng
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:42:38AM +0800, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:47:05 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > From: Dong Aisheng > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > --- > > The patch is still using a private way for dma part binding > > since the common dma binding is sti

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-13 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Dong Aisheng, > From: Dong Aisheng > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > --- > The patch is still using a private way for dma part binding > since the common dma binding is still under discussion. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65528.html > > Will update to use common dma bin

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support

2012-03-13 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:47:05 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > From: Dong Aisheng > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > --- > The patch is still using a private way for dma part binding > since the common dma binding is still under discussion. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65528.html >