On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Ken Teague wrote:
> I have a 17-node cluster and each node has a single IB card that has
> 2x IB ports (ib0 and ib1).
After doing a little more research, I confirmed that my understanding
of the manual page is correct. To run opensm for each GUID, I
modified
Hey Sasha,
This patch supports diffing node descriptions on remote ports
(previously diffing of just the "local" node description was supported).
Al
--
Albert Chu
ch...@llnl.gov
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
--- Begin Message ---
Si
I have a 17-node cluster and each node has a single IB card that has
2x IB ports (ib0 and ib1). I have each node plugging in to an IB
switch; one cable between ib0 and the respective A-channel and another
cable between ib1 and the respective B-channel (e.g. c2n2, ib0 leads
to switch port 2A / c2n2
Hi Amir,
have you any news about bugs 2027 "SDP not respecting # SGEs as reported
from HW" and 2028 "SDP should support fastreg mrs"?
When those bugs will be fixed, I will test the NE020 cards performance
with SDP protocol and I will compare SDP and TCP.
Keep in touch,
Andrea Gozzelino
INFN -
Håkon Bugge wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 16:23 , Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
The additional operands are carried in the Extended Transport Header
Is this a newly defined ETH which follows the AETH on the wire?
Thanks, Håkon
Yes,
Atomic masked Fetch and Add uses first 64 bits to provide the
