Jason wrote,
>I was commenting specifically on the idea that we'd ever release a libverbs
>that forced a kernel upgrade. I hope we all agree that is not acceptable.
This means that user-space and kernel space packages can be released on
separate schedules, so there is no need to tie the two toge
Sean wrote,
>The issue is that basically no one tests the releases of the packages.
We assume that the maintainer of the package tests it before they release it :)
The OFED testing then tests all the currently released packages as a bundle
with a released kernel version backported to a distro
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:42:08AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>We are well past the point of doing experimental breaking stuff in the core
>uapi libraries. If it is in the master git it should be shippable by a distro,
>and it is so easy >to slap a version number on the HEAD if a distro/ofed/e
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Right. Its really nasty when you are trying to add features that require
> libibverbs and libmlx? changes. Plus it may depend on kernel changes.
On the other hand, combining everything into one package limits the ability of
the maintainer of the i
Doug Ledford wrote:
>git://git.openfabrics.org/~yishaih/libmlx4.git
>git://git.openfabrics.org/~eli/libmlx5.git
The OFA maintainers list contains this for the maintainers of these trees.
ibmlx4 (upstream): Yishai Hadas
http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/mlx4
git://git.openfabrics.org/~yishai
Ram Amrani wrote,
>In the latest OFED (3.18-rc3) I don't see any RoCE v2 code, albeit it being
>introduce in 2014. How come?
These patches have not yet been accepted upstream and since OFED now pulls the
kernel code from upstream,
It is not yet in OFED-3.18 that was based on the kernel.org 3.18
I seem to be getting this compile error on sles 11 sp 2.
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/compat-rdma-3.5/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c:33:1:
warning: "pr_fmt" redefined
In file included from
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/compat-rdma-3.5/include/linux/printk.h:7,
from /usr/src/lin
Daniel wrote,
>It's been a week since I posted this question. Being new to this list, I would
>really appreciate some constructive responses...
There are some companies that are using OFED over rapidio,
they presented at the OFA workshop last year, but so far I do not think they
have not open sou
Sean wrote,
>> - OFED will offer only backports to the distros (no fixes)
> I think this point needs to be clarified - at least to me anyway. :)
What this means is that the OFED code base will be identical to what
is included in the upstream kernel and libs.
OFED will provide only backports to a
Hi List,
I just noticed a small bug in the release notes. It says that the code was
tested with Intel MPI 4.0 beta and
in fact I tested it with Intel MPI 4.0.2 GA version. Sorry for the error.
woody
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vge
Devesh Sharma wrote,
>Hello List,
>Kindly someone help me on this. I need to know about promiscuous mode
>support in IPoIB and have a confusion if it is possible at all on
>IPoIB stack. If yes then How?
I am not sure that it is supported, but Eli would know for sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Michael wrote,
>For those of us that are not hardcore kernel developers can you
>explain what this change would actually do? I'm not sure i understand
>how having a source tree with the patches already applied is any
>different then taking the base kernel and applying a patch tree. But
>then agai
Christoph wrote,
>I surely wish this constant nightmare would go away. Could we please have
>OFED trees against each kernel version in use somewhere so that we can
>just do a git pull to get these into the respective trees?
Other people have also asked for this, i.e., a source tree for each kerne
Pradeep wrote,
>With IBoE/RoCEE, the traditional SM in IB clusters is not needed. Most of the
>current
>IB tools rely on the SM and PM to get packet and error statistics and so on.
>These
>won't be applicable with IBoE/RoCEE. netstat will have no value since the
>kernel
>has been bypassed. So
Tziporet wrote,
>Bill - do you know who is the administrator that can fix this
>We cannot access git and also web site and ewg mailing list does not
>work
I cannot access it either. Does anyone know where it is physically located ?
woody
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
What is soft RDMA over ethernet, does this mean it is RDMAoE that will run over
any ethernet interface that is installed in the system ?
woody
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of frank zago
Sent: Wednesday, De
Hi all, for those that cannot attend SC'09 but would like to attend the Open
Fabrics
BOF remotely, we will be braodcasting the BOF via webex.
See below for the details on how to attend via webex.
See you at the BOF,
Bob Woodruff
Topic: OpenFabrics SC09 BOF
Date: Wednesday, November 18
Sending this to the EWG openfabrics list,
since this seems to be an OFED build/installation issue
rather than a general code problem.
One thing that you might try is to instead of copying the
entire build directory and re-runing ./install.pl -c ofed.conf
on each system, instead, after building on
18 matches
Mail list logo
