On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:15 -0700, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> [snip...]
>
> On 20/Nov/09 21:15, Jim Schutt wrote:
> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > index 08f9a60..f42c334 100644
> > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>
Hi Jim,
[snip...]
On 20/Nov/09 21:15, Jim Schutt wrote:
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
index 08f9a60..f42c334 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static ib_api_status_t sl2vl_update(osm_sm_t * sm,
osm_port_t * p
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 05:36 -0700, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Just started reading this stuff, so it's going to take a while :-)
Thanks for taking a look.
> Meanwhile, first question:
>
> On 20/Nov/09 21:15, Jim Schutt wrote:
> > Note that the original code assumes that QoS setup i
Hi Jim,
Just started reading this stuff, so it's going to take a while :-)
Meanwhile, first question:
On 20/Nov/09 21:15, Jim Schutt wrote:
Note that the original code assumes that QoS setup is mostly static and
based only on user configuration. As a result, there is no provision for
routing e
Note that the original code assumes that QoS setup is mostly static and
based only on user configuration. As a result, there is no provision for
routing engines that want to compute contributions to the SL2VL maps.
Fix this up by adding a callback to struct osm_routing_engine that computes
a per-
