Aaah. Ira pointed me at a previous thread that provided some
context. I thought the concern was with the display of mkey results in
a query, not on the command line. I hadn't noticed the getpass()
support for smkey. It makes sense that mkey should operate the same
way.
Jim
On Tue, 2
On 3/9/2012 2:17 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 05:00 -0800, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> On 3/6/2012 5:16 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
>>>
>>> Displaying/changing are both supported for the
>>> MKey itself, plus lease and protect bits
>>
>> Don't we want to be careful about displaying mk
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 05:00 -0800, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 3/6/2012 5:16 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
> >
> > Displaying/changing are both supported for the
> > MKey itself, plus lease and protect bits
>
> Don't we want to be careful about displaying mkey info ? I think by
> default it shouldn't b
On 3/6/2012 5:16 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
>
> Displaying/changing are both supported for the
> MKey itself, plus lease and protect bits
Don't we want to be careful about displaying mkey info ? I think by
default it shouldn't be displayed and at least require an additional
option to make it visible
Displaying/changing are both supported for the
MKey itself, plus lease and protect bits
Signed-off-by: Jim Foraker
---
src/ibportstate.c | 64 +++-
1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/ibportstate.c b/src/ibportst
