On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:27:12PM -0700, Jim Foraker wrote:
> for zone work. My impression is that most IB admins want to be able to
> run diagnostics from anywhere on the fabric, which implies much wider
> deployment. For the most part, if the keyfile ends up on every host,
> it's not all that
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 09:50 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:09:07PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
>
> > > I don't think using passwords for this sort of thing is really a good
> > > idea. It has been shown again and again the extrapolating keys from
> > > passwords does no
On 3/13/2012 12:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> On 3/9/2012 1:04 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>>
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:09:07PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
> > I don't think using passwords for this sort of thing is really a good
> > idea. It has been shown again and again the extrapolating keys from
> > passwords does not stand up. Better to design around a large true
> > random key (eg ho
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 3/9/2012 1:04 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> >> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> >> single mkey for all ports in the subn
On 3/9/2012 1:04 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
>> single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
>> flexible model. If so, I think we ne
On 3/9/2012 12:09 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
>> single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
>> flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
>> allows each port to have it's own d
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 13:01 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > >
> > > > What mkey model is being
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > > What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> > > single mkey for all p
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> > What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> > single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
> > flexible model. If
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:04:59 -0700
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> > What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> > single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
> > flexible model. If
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
> flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
> allows each por
> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
> single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
> flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
> allows each port to have it's own different mkey.
Is something more needed than
On 3/6/2012 5:12 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
allows each port to have it's own different mke
Signed-off-by: Jim Foraker
---
include/infiniband/mad.h |2 ++
src/libibmad.map |2 ++
src/mad_internal.h |1 +
src/smp.c| 12
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/infiniband/mad.h b/include/infiniband/ma
15 matches
Mail list logo
