> On Nov 23, 2015, at 8:22 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2015 8:16 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/23/2015 5:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Rarely, senders post a Send that is larger than the client's inline
threshold. That
On 11/23/2015 8:16 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 11/23/2015 5:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Rarely, senders post a Send that is larger than the client's inline
threshold. That can be due to a bug, or the client and server may
not have communicated about
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2015 5:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Rarely, senders post a Send that is larger than the client's inline
>> threshold. That can be due to a bug, or the client and server may
>> not have communicated about their inline limits. RPC-over-
On 11/23/2015 5:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Rarely, senders post a Send that is larger than the client's inline
threshold. That can be due to a bug, or the client and server may
not have communicated about their inline limits. RPC-over-RDMA
currently doesn't specify any particular limit on inline s
Rarely, senders post a Send that is larger than the client's inline
threshold. That can be due to a bug, or the client and server may
not have communicated about their inline limits. RPC-over-RDMA
currently doesn't specify any particular limit on inline size, so
peers have to guess what it is.
It
