On 07:26 Sat 23 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > Yes, and how is this different from the original patch?
>
> The original patch didn't do this but missed accounting for the switch
> port 0 configuration.
I cannot understand. What do you mean?
> > Remember, that there is a different config
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 15:14 Wed 13 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> >> > @@ -223,12 +222,20 @@ static int qos_extports_setup(osm_sm_t * sm,
>> >> > osm_node_t *node,
>> >> > if (!(p0->port_info.capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP))
>> >> >
On 15:14 Wed 13 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> > @@ -223,12 +222,20 @@ static int qos_extports_setup(osm_sm_t * sm,
> >> > osm_node_t *node,
> >> >if (!(p0->port_info.capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP))
> >> >return ret;
> >> >
> >> > + if (ib_switch_info
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 08:35 Thu 07 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> > index f54e995..6bbbfa2 100644
>> > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> > @@ -1,5
On 08:35 Thu 07 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > index f54e995..6bbbfa2 100644
> > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > /*
> > * Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Voltaire, Inc. All
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 13:18 Tue 05 Jan , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>> >
>> > Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
>> > needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
>> > SLtoVLMappingTable.
>> >
>> > Signed-
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
>> needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
>> SLtoVLMappingTable.
>>
>
On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
> needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
> SLtoVLMappingTable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
Rebased and Applied. Thanks.
Sasha
--
To unsubscrib
On 13:18 Tue 05 Jan , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> >
> > Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
> > needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
> > SLtoVLMappingTable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a
Hi Hal,
On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
> needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
> SLtoVLMappingTable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> ---
[snip]
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
>> needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
>> SLtoVLMappingTable.
>>
Hi Hal,
On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
> needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
> SLtoVLMappingTable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> Use osm_log rath
Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs
needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8
SLtoVLMappingTable.
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
---
Changes since v2:
Use osm_log rather than OSM_LOG in osm_slvl_rcv_process for optimized
sl2vl mapping program
13 matches
Mail list logo
