RE: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c

2011-07-13 Thread Bob Pearson
ux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David Dillow Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 11:55 AM To: Bob Pearson Cc: 'Roland Dreier'; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:09 -0500, Bob Pearson wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Perhaps. We ha

RE: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c

2011-07-02 Thread David Dillow
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:09 -0500, Bob Pearson wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Perhaps. We have some ICRC specific APIs as well as plain Jane CRC > calculation that includes a copy at the same time. > If I knew who maintained crc32.c I would be happy to talk to them and see > what they think. No one is r

RE: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c

2011-07-01 Thread Bob Pearson
-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 5:04 PM To: rpear...@systemfabricworks.com Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM, wrote: > Slice by 8 implem

Re: [patch 37/44] rxe_sb8.c

2011-07-01 Thread Roland Dreier
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM, wrote: > Slice by 8 implementation of CRC32. > The code code is similar to the kernel provided crc32 > calculation except runs about 3X faster which allows us to > get to ~1GB/sec. Wouldn't the sane thing to do be to fix lib/crc32.c instead? - R. -- To unsubscri