Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Vivek Gautam
>> wrote:
>> > Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
>> > Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in orde
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
Thanks for reviewing this. Please find my comments inline below.
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
>> Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
>> Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
> > Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
> > Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order
> > to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
> Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order
> to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
> device tree side change for ohci-exynos.
> Once we move to new p
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
> Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order
> to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
> device tree side change for ohci-exynos.
> Once we m
Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order
to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
device tree side change for ohci-exynos.
Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ohci, we can
remove the s
