Re: MS at it again ....

2004-01-22 Thread Wesley Parish
e: > > > > If it was only filed last year, surely there is plenty of > > > > prior art > > > > > > in OpenOffice? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > &g

RE: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread John Ascroft
Hard to say without checking every person on the list, but I certainly only get one copy. ---Original Message--- From: FXNZ CHC ["Fisher, Robert] Date: Thu 1/22/2004 09:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MS at it again Am I the only person who receives 2 of every posting from

RE: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
] Subject:RE: MS at it again > sorry when did MS start on xml as a format for office docs? > before OO I do believe! I'm not familiar with patent law (and it's different everywhere), and I'm not about to disagree with a lawyer about this :) But, just because they were

RE: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread Brad Beveridge
enOffice? > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:42 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: MS at it again > >

Re: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread Dale Anderson
2004 10:32, Brad Beveridge wrote: > > > If it was only filed last year, surely there is plenty of prior art > > > in OpenOffice? > > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tue

Re: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread Nick Rout
; > in OpenOffice? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:42 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: MS at it again > > > > > >

Re: MS at it again ....

2004-01-21 Thread Wesley Parish
t; If it was only filed last year, surely there is plenty of prior art in > OpenOffice? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:42 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: MS at i

RE: MS at it again ....

2004-01-20 Thread Brad Beveridge
If it was only filed last year, surely there is plenty of prior art in OpenOffice? > -Original Message- > From: Dale Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MS at it again > > > Hi Al

MS at it again ....

2004-01-20 Thread Dale Anderson
Hi All Just noticed this interest snippet . http://www.nzoss.org.nz/portal/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=284 <-- kinda a worry . Cheers Dale.